Ultra 7 256V vs i9-7940X

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-7940X
2017
14 cores / 28 threads, 165 Watt
16.34
+34.4%
Core Ultra 7 256V
2024
8 cores / 8 threads, 17 Watt
12.16

Core i9-7940X outperforms Core Ultra 7 256V by a substantial 34% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-7940X and Core Ultra 7 256V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking402632
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.21no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i9no data
Power efficiency9.3767.69
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)Lunar Lake (2024)
Release date1 September 2017 (7 years ago)24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,399no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i9-7940X and Core Ultra 7 256V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads288
Base clock speed3.1 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s37 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)192 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)2.5 MB (per core)
L3 cache19.25 MB (shared)12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm3 nm
Die size484 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature102 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-7940X and Core Ultra 7 256V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA2066Intel BGA 2833
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-7940X and Core Ultra 7 256V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data

Security technologies

Core i9-7940X and Core Ultra 7 256V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-7940X and Core Ultra 7 256V are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-7940X and Core Ultra 7 256V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR5
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AArc 140V

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-7940X and Core Ultra 7 256V.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes444

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-7940X 16.34
+34.4%
Ultra 7 256V 12.16

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i9-7940X 25954
+34.3%
Ultra 7 256V 19320

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.34 12.16
Recency 1 September 2017 24 September 2024
Physical cores 14 8
Threads 28 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 17 Watt

i9-7940X has a 34.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 75% more physical cores and 250% more threads.

Ultra 7 256V, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 366.7% more advanced lithography process, and 870.6% lower power consumption.

The Core i9-7940X is our recommended choice as it beats the Core Ultra 7 256V in performance tests.

Note that Core i9-7940X is a desktop processor while Core Ultra 7 256V is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-7940X and Core Ultra 7 256V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-7940X
Core i9-7940X
Intel Core Ultra 7 256V
Core Ultra 7 256V

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 42 votes

Rate Core i9-7940X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Core Ultra 7 256V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-7940X or Core Ultra 7 256V, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.