Xeon E5 1680 v4 vs i9-7900X

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-7900X
2017
10 cores / 20 threads, 140 Watt
13.25
+48%
Xeon E5 1680 v4
2016
8 cores / 16 threads, 140 Watt
8.95

Core i9-7900X outperforms Xeon E5 1680 v4 by a considerable 48% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-7900X and Xeon E5-1680 v4 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking569865
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.951.95
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesCore i9 (Desktop)Intel Xeon E5
Power efficiency8.966.05
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)Broadwell-EP (2016)
Release date26 June 2017 (7 years ago)20 June 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$999$1,723

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i9-7900X has 51% better value for money than Xeon E5 1680 v4.

Detailed specifications

Core i9-7900X and Xeon E5-1680 v4 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads2016
Base clock speed3.3 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz4 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0DMI 2.0
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s5 GT/s
Multiplier3334
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache14 MB (shared)20 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data246.24 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C70 °C
Number of transistorsno data3,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-7900X and Xeon E5-1680 v4 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketSocket R4FCLGA2011
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt140 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-7900X and Xeon E5-1680 v4. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data+
PAEno data46 Bit
Turbo Boost Max 3.0++

Security technologies

Core i9-7900X and Xeon E5-1680 v4 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-7900X and Xeon E5-1680 v4 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-7900X and Xeon E5-1680 v4. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400
Maximum memory size128 GB1.5 TB
Max memory channels44
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/s76.8 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-7900X and Xeon E5-1680 v4.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4440

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.25 8.95
Recency 26 June 2017 20 June 2016
Physical cores 10 8
Threads 20 16

i9-7900X has a 48% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 25% more physical cores and 25% more threads.

The Core i9-7900X is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5 1680 v4 in performance tests.

Note that Core i9-7900X is a desktop processor while Xeon E5 1680 v4 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-7900X and Xeon E5 1680 v4, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-7900X
Core i9-7900X
Xeon E5 1680 v4
Xeon E5 1680 v4

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 223 votes

Rate Core i9-7900X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 70 votes

Rate Xeon E5 1680 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-7900X or Xeon E5 1680 v4, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.