i5-13490F vs i9-7900X

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-7900X
2017
10 cores / 20 threads, 140 Watt
13.25
Core i5-13490F
2023
10 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
17.36
+31%

Core i5-13490F outperforms Core i9-7900X by a substantial 31% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-7900X and Core i5-13490F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking560360
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.8751.85
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesCore i9 (Desktop)no data
Power efficiency8.9625.28
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date26 June 2017 (7 years ago)10 February 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$999$235

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i5-13490F has 1707% better value for money than i9-7900X.

Detailed specifications

Core i9-7900X and Core i5-13490F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads2016
Base clock speed3.3 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier33no data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache14 MB (shared)24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Die sizeno data215 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-7900X and Core i5-13490F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketSocket R41700
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-7900X and Core i5-13490F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data

Security technologies

Core i9-7900X and Core i5-13490F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-7900X and Core i5-13490F are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d++
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-7900X and Core i5-13490F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-7900X and Core i5-13490F.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes4416

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-7900X 13.25
i5-13490F 17.36
+31%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i9-7900X 21049
i5-13490F 27574
+31%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.25 17.36
Recency 26 June 2017 10 February 2023
Threads 20 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 65 Watt

i9-7900X has 25% more threads.

i5-13490F, on the other hand, has a 31% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 115.4% lower power consumption.

The Core i5-13490F is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i9-7900X in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-7900X and Core i5-13490F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-7900X
Core i9-7900X
Intel Core i5-13490F
Core i5-13490F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 216 votes

Rate Core i9-7900X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 163 votes

Rate Core i5-13490F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-7900X or Core i5-13490F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.