Ryzen 7 8700F vs i9-13900TE

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-13900TE
2023
24 cores / 32 threads, 35 Watt
10.00
Ryzen 7 8700F
2024
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
19.38
+93.8%

Ryzen 7 8700F outperforms Core i9-13900TE by an impressive 94% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-13900TE and Ryzen 7 8700F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking771296
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data51.91
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency26.9328.10
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake-S (2023−2024)Phoenix (2023−2024)
Release date4 January 2023 (1 year ago)1 April 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$270

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i9-13900TE and Ryzen 7 8700F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads3216
Base clock speed1 GHz4.1 GHz
Boost clock speed5 GHz5 GHz
L1 cache80K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache36 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm4 nm
Die size257 mm2178 mm2
Number of transistorsno data25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-13900TE and Ryzen 7 8700F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket1700AM5
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-13900TE and Ryzen 7 8700F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core i9-13900TE and Ryzen 7 8700F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-13900TE and Ryzen 7 8700F are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-13900TE and Ryzen 7 8700F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 770N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-13900TE and Ryzen 7 8700F.

PCIe version5.04.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-13900TE 10.00
Ryzen 7 8700F 19.38
+93.8%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i9-13900TE 15819
Ryzen 7 8700F 30663
+93.8%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.00 19.38
Recency 4 January 2023 1 April 2024
Physical cores 24 8
Threads 32 16
Chip lithography 10 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 65 Watt

i9-13900TE has 200% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 85.7% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 7 8700F, on the other hand, has a 93.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 7 8700F is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i9-13900TE in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-13900TE and Ryzen 7 8700F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-13900TE
Core i9-13900TE
AMD Ryzen 7 8700F
Ryzen 7 8700F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 5 votes

Rate Core i9-13900TE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 165 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 8700F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-13900TE or Ryzen 7 8700F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.