Xeon w7-2495X vs Core i9-13900KS
Aggregate performance score
i9-13900KS outperforms Xeon w7-2495X by a small 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i9-13900KS and Xeon w7-2495X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 62 | 74 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 87.49 | 30.65 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Architecture codename | Raptor Lake-S | Sapphire Rapids |
| Release date | 12 January 2023 (1 year ago) | 1 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
i9-13900KS has 185% better value for money than Xeon w7-2495X.
Detailed specifications
Core i9-13900KS and Xeon w7-2495X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) |
| Threads | 32 | 48 |
| Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 6 GHz | 4.8 GHz |
| L1 cache | 80K (per core) | 80K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 36 MB (shared) | 45 MB |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 257 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | 77 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | Yes | Yes |
Compatibility
Information on Core i9-13900KS and Xeon w7-2495X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 1700 | 4677 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 225 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-13900KS and Xeon w7-2495X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| TSX | + | + |
Security technologies
Core i9-13900KS and Xeon w7-2495X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-13900KS and Xeon w7-2495X are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-13900KS and Xeon w7-2495X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel | DDR5-4800 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-13900KS and Xeon w7-2495X.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | 64 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Core i9-13900KS outperforms Xeon w7-2495X by 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Core i9-13900KS outperforms Xeon w7-2495X by 5% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Core i9-13900KS outperforms Xeon w7-2495X by 34% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Core i9-13900KS outperforms Xeon w7-2495X by 18% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 39.92 | 37.93 |
| Threads | 32 | 48 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 225 Watt |
i9-13900KS has a 5.2% higher aggregate performance score, and 50% lower power consumption.
Xeon w7-2495X, on the other hand, has 50% more threads.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core i9-13900KS and Xeon w7-2495X.
Note that Core i9-13900KS is a desktop processor while Xeon w7-2495X is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-13900KS and Xeon w7-2495X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
