Ryzen 7 8700G vs i9-13900KS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-13900KS
2023
24 cores / 32 threads, 150 Watt
38.68
+93.3%
Ryzen 7 8700G
2024
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
20.01

Core i9-13900KS outperforms Ryzen 7 8700G by an impressive 93% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-13900KS and Ryzen 7 8700G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking73283
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation55.8647.31
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency24.4029.13
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake-S (2023−2024)Phoenix (2023−2024)
Release date12 January 2023 (1 year ago)8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$699$329

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i9-13900KS has 18% better value for money than Ryzen 7 8700G.

Detailed specifications

Core i9-13900KS and Ryzen 7 8700G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Performance-cores8no data
Efficient-cores16no data
Threads3216
Base clock speed3.2 GHz4.2 GHz
Boost clock speed5.8 GHz5.1 GHz
L1 cache80K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache36 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm4 nm
Die size257 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C95 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-13900KS and Ryzen 7 8700G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1700AM5
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-13900KS and Ryzen 7 8700G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI1, BMI2, SHA, F16C, FMA3, NX-Bit, AMD64, EVP, AMD-V, SMAP, SMEP, SMT, Precision Boost 2, XDNA2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Core i9-13900KS and Ryzen 7 8700G technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-13900KS and Ryzen 7 8700G are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-13900KS and Ryzen 7 8700G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-5600, DDR4-3200DDR5
Maximum memory size192 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth89.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics 770AMD Radeon 780M
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.65 GHzno data
Execution Units32no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i9-13900KS and Ryzen 7 8700G integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported4no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i9-13900KS and Ryzen 7 8700G integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2160 @ 60Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP5120 x 3200 @ 120Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i9-13900KS and Ryzen 7 8700G integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-13900KS and Ryzen 7 8700G.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.04.0
PCI Express lanes2020

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-13900KS 38.68
+93.3%
Ryzen 7 8700G 20.01

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i9-13900KS 61447
+93.3%
Ryzen 7 8700G 31792

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i9-13900KS 3138
+17.7%
Ryzen 7 8700G 2666

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i9-13900KS 21715
+57.9%
Ryzen 7 8700G 13752

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 38.68 20.01
Integrated graphics card 6.16 18.30
Recency 12 January 2023 8 January 2024
Physical cores 24 8
Threads 32 16
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 65 Watt

i9-13900KS has a 93.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 200% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Ryzen 7 8700G, on the other hand, has 197.1% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 11 months, and 130.8% lower power consumption.

The Core i9-13900KS is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 8700G in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-13900KS and Ryzen 7 8700G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-13900KS
Core i9-13900KS
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
Ryzen 7 8700G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 843 votes

Rate Core i9-13900KS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 265 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 8700G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-13900KS or Ryzen 7 8700G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.