Xeon Gold 6423N vs i9-13900KF

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-13900KF
2022
24 cores / 32 threads, 125 Watt
36.71
+1.5%
Xeon Gold 6423N
2023
28 cores / 56 threads, 195 Watt
36.16

Core i9-13900KF outperforms Xeon Gold 6423N by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-13900KF and Xeon Gold 6423N processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking9398
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation61.37no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesIntel Core i9no data
Power efficiency13.7317.55
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)no data
Release date27 September 2022 (2 years ago)1 July 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$564no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i9-13900KF and Xeon Gold 6423N basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)28 (Octacosa-Core)
Threads3256
Base clock speed3 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed5.7 GHz3.6 GHz
Bus rate4 × 16 GT/sno data
Multiplier30no data
L1 cache80K (per core)no data
L2 cache2 MB (per core)no data
L3 cache36 MB (shared)52.5 MB
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size257 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C85 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-13900KF and Xeon Gold 6423N compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA1700FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)125 W, 253 Watt195 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-13900KF and Xeon Gold 6423N. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Core i9-13900KF and Xeon Gold 6423N technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-13900KF and Xeon Gold 6423N are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-13900KF and Xeon Gold 6423N. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-5600, DDR4-3200DDR5-4400
Maximum memory size192 GB4 TB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth89.604 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-13900KF and Xeon Gold 6423N.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.04
PCI Express lanes2064

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-13900KF 36.71
+1.5%
Xeon Gold 6423N 36.16

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i9-13900KF 58305
+1.5%
Xeon Gold 6423N 57434

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 36.71 36.16
Recency 27 September 2022 1 July 2023
Physical cores 24 28
Threads 32 56
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 195 Watt

i9-13900KF has a 1.5% higher aggregate performance score, and 56% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 6423N, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 months, and 16.7% more physical cores and 75% more threads.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core i9-13900KF and Xeon Gold 6423N.

Note that Core i9-13900KF is a desktop processor while Xeon Gold 6423N is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-13900KF and Xeon Gold 6423N, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-13900KF
Core i9-13900KF
Intel Xeon Gold 6423N
Xeon Gold 6423N

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 629 votes

Rate Core i9-13900KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Gold 6423N on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-13900KF or Xeon Gold 6423N, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.