EPYC 9654 vs i9-13900KF

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-13900KF
2022
24 cores / 32 threads, 125 Watt
36.67
EPYC 9654
2022
96 cores / 192 threads, 360 Watt
75.70
+106%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Core i9-13900KF by a whopping 106% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-13900KF and EPYC 9654 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking936
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation64.621.36
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesIntel Core i9AMD EPYC
Power efficiency13.7119.89
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)Genoa (2022−2023)
Release date27 September 2022 (2 years ago)10 November 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$564$11,805

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i9-13900KF has 4651% better value for money than EPYC 9654.

Detailed specifications

Core i9-13900KF and EPYC 9654 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)96
Threads32192
Base clock speed3 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed5.7 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus rate4 × 16 GT/sno data
Multiplier3024
L1 cache80K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache36 MB (shared)384 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die size257 mm212x 72 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data78,840 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-13900KF and EPYC 9654 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCLGA1700SP5
Power consumption (TDP)125 W, 253 Watt360 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-13900KF and EPYC 9654. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Core i9-13900KF and EPYC 9654 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-13900KF and EPYC 9654 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-13900KF and EPYC 9654. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-5600, DDR4-3200DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size192 GB6 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth89.604 GB/s460.8 GB/s

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-13900KF and EPYC 9654.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.05.0
PCI Express lanes20128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-13900KF 36.67
EPYC 9654 75.70
+106%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i9-13900KF 58254
EPYC 9654 120246
+106%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i9-13900KF 2920
+59%
EPYC 9654 1837

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i9-13900KF 19643
+4.3%
EPYC 9654 18836

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 36.67 75.70
Recency 27 September 2022 10 November 2022
Physical cores 24 96
Threads 32 192
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 360 Watt

i9-13900KF has 188% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9654, on the other hand, has a 106.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 month, and 300% more physical cores and 500% more threads.

The EPYC 9654 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i9-13900KF in performance tests.

Note that Core i9-13900KF is a desktop processor while EPYC 9654 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-13900KF and EPYC 9654, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-13900KF
Core i9-13900KF
AMD EPYC 9654
EPYC 9654

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 642 votes

Rate Core i9-13900KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 995 votes

Rate EPYC 9654 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-13900KF or EPYC 9654, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.