Xeon w5-3425 vs i9-13900K

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-13900K
2022
24 cores / 32 threads, 125 Watt
37.09
+60.7%
Xeon w5-3425
2023
12 cores / 24 threads, 270 Watt
23.08

Core i9-13900K outperforms Xeon w5-3425 by an impressive 61% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-13900K and Xeon w5-3425 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking88225
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation62.9352.11
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesIntel Core i9no data
Power efficiency28.088.09
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date27 September 2022 (2 years ago)15 February 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$589$1,189

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i9-13900K has 21% better value for money than Xeon w5-3425.

Detailed specifications

Core i9-13900K and Xeon w5-3425 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads3224
Base clock speed3 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed5.7 GHz4.6 GHz
Bus rate4 × 16 GT/sno data
Multiplier30no data
L1 cache1.5 MB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache16 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB30 MB
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size257 mm24x 477 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-13900K and Xeon w5-3425 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1700FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)125 W, 253 Watt270 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-13900K and Xeon w5-3425. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
SIPP+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0++
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Core i9-13900K and Xeon w5-3425 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
SGXno data-
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-13900K and Xeon w5-3425 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-13900K and Xeon w5-3425. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR5DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size192 GB4 TB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth89.604 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 770N/A
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.65 GHzno data
Execution Units32no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i9-13900K and Xeon w5-3425 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported4no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i9-13900K and Xeon w5-3425 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2160 @ 60Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP5120 x 3200 @ 120Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i9-13900K and Xeon w5-3425 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-13900K and Xeon w5-3425.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.05.0
PCI Express lanes20112

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-13900K 37.09
+60.7%
Xeon w5-3425 23.08

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i9-13900K 58917
+60.7%
Xeon w5-3425 36659

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i9-13900K 3001
+57%
Xeon w5-3425 1912

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i9-13900K 20187
+61.8%
Xeon w5-3425 12475

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 37.09 23.08
Recency 27 September 2022 15 February 2023
Physical cores 24 12
Threads 32 24
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 270 Watt

i9-13900K has a 60.7% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads, and 116% lower power consumption.

Xeon w5-3425, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 months.

The Core i9-13900K is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon w5-3425 in performance tests.

Note that Core i9-13900K is a desktop processor while Xeon w5-3425 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-13900K and Xeon w5-3425, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-13900K
Core i9-13900K
Intel Xeon w5-3425
Xeon w5-3425

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 1960 votes

Rate Core i9-13900K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 5 votes

Rate Xeon w5-3425 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-13900K or Xeon w5-3425, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.