Ultra 7 165H vs i9-13900E

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-13900E
2023
24 cores / 32 threads, 65 Watt
21.44
+29.9%
Core Ultra 7 165H
2023
16 cores / 22 threads, 28 Watt
16.50

Core i9-13900E outperforms Core Ultra 7 165H by a substantial 30% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-13900E and Core Ultra 7 165H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking254402
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Meteor Lake-H
Power efficiency31.2055.73
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake-S (2023−2024)Meteor Lake-H (2023)
Release date4 January 2023 (1 year ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$460

Detailed specifications

Core i9-13900E and Core Ultra 7 165H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads3222
Base clock speed1.8 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed5.2 GHz5 GHz
L1 cache80K (per core)112 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache36 MB (shared)24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm7 nm
Die size257 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data110 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-13900E and Core Ultra 7 165H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket1700Intel BGA 2049
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-13900E and Core Ultra 7 165H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
TSX++

Security technologies

Core i9-13900E and Core Ultra 7 165H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-13900E and Core Ultra 7 165H are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-13900E and Core Ultra 7 165H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics 770Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU ( - 2300 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-13900E and Core Ultra 7 165H.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes168

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-13900E 21.44
+29.9%
Ultra 7 165H 16.50

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i9-13900E 34049
+29.9%
Ultra 7 165H 26214

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 21.44 16.50
Integrated graphics card 6.16 18.48
Recency 4 January 2023 14 December 2023
Physical cores 24 16
Threads 32 22
Chip lithography 10 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 28 Watt

i9-13900E has a 29.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 50% more physical cores and 45.5% more threads.

Ultra 7 165H, on the other hand, has 200% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 11 months, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 132.1% lower power consumption.

The Core i9-13900E is our recommended choice as it beats the Core Ultra 7 165H in performance tests.

Note that Core i9-13900E is a desktop processor while Core Ultra 7 165H is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-13900E and Core Ultra 7 165H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-13900E
Core i9-13900E
Intel Core Ultra 7 165H
Core Ultra 7 165H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Core i9-13900E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 44 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 165H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-13900E or Core Ultra 7 165H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.