Xeon w7-2475X vs i9-13900

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-13900
2023
24 cores / 32 threads, 125 Watt
29.57
Xeon w7-2475X
2023
20 cores / 40 threads, 225 Watt
34.78
+17.6%

Xeon w7-2475X outperforms Core i9-13900 by a moderate 18% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-13900 and Xeon w7-2475X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking144107
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation46.0058.65
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency22.3914.63
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake-S (2023−2024)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date4 January 2023 (1 year ago)15 February 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$549$1,789

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon w7-2475X has 28% better value for money than i9-13900.

Detailed specifications

Core i9-13900 and Xeon w7-2475X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads3240
Base clock speed2 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed5.5 GHz4.8 GHz
L1 cache80K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache36 MB (shared)37.5 MB
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size257 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C76 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-13900 and Xeon w7-2475X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1700FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt225 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-13900 and Xeon w7-2475X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
SIPP+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0++
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Core i9-13900 and Xeon w7-2475X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
SGXno data-
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-13900 and Xeon w7-2475X are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-13900 and Xeon w7-2475X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-5600, DDR4-3200DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size192 GB2 TB
Max memory channels24
Maximum memory bandwidth89.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 770N/A
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.65 GHzno data
Execution Units32no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i9-13900 and Xeon w7-2475X integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported4no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i9-13900 and Xeon w7-2475X integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2160 @ 60Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP5120 x 3200 @ 120Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i9-13900 and Xeon w7-2475X integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-13900 and Xeon w7-2475X.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.05.0
PCI Express lanes1664

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-13900 29.57
Xeon w7-2475X 34.78
+17.6%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i9-13900 46967
Xeon w7-2475X 55249
+17.6%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i9-13900 2763
+32.4%
Xeon w7-2475X 2087

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i9-13900 16611
+8%
Xeon w7-2475X 15377

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 29.57 34.78
Recency 4 January 2023 15 February 2023
Physical cores 24 20
Threads 32 40
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 225 Watt

i9-13900 has 20% more physical cores, and 80% lower power consumption.

Xeon w7-2475X, on the other hand, has a 17.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 month, and 25% more threads.

The Xeon w7-2475X is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i9-13900 in performance tests.

Note that Core i9-13900 is a desktop processor while Xeon w7-2475X is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-13900 and Xeon w7-2475X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-13900
Core i9-13900
Intel Xeon w7-2475X
Xeon w7-2475X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 118 votes

Rate Core i9-13900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 7 votes

Rate Xeon w7-2475X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-13900 or Xeon w7-2475X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.