Core i7-14700HX vs Core i9-12900HK

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-12900HK
2022
14 cores / 20 threads, 45 Watt
17.78
Core i7-14700HX
2024
20 cores / 28 threads, 55 Watt
23.34
+31.3%

i7-14700HX outperforms i9-12900HK by a substantial 31% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-12900HK and Core i7-14700HX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking322199
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Alder Lake-PRaptor Lake-HX
Architecture codenameAlder Lake-H (2022)Raptor Lake-HX Refresh
Release date4 January 2022 (2 years ago)9 January 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Core i9-12900HK and Core i7-14700HX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads2028
Base clock speed2.5 GHz3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed5 GHz5.5 GHz
L1 cache1.2 MBno data
L2 cache11.5 MB24 MB
L3 cache24 MB30 MB
Chip lithography10 nm10 nm
Die size217 mm2257 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-12900HK and Core i7-14700HX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketBGA1744BGA1964
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt55 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-12900HK and Core i7-14700HX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMAno data+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
TSX+no data

Security technologies

Core i9-12900HK and Core i7-14700HX technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-12900HK and Core i7-14700HX are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-12900HK and Core i7-14700HX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR5DDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory bandwidthno data89.6 GB/s
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUsIntel UHD Graphics 770

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-12900HK and Core i7-14700HX.

PCIe version4.0no data
PCI Express lanes2020

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-12900HK 17.78
i7-14700HX 23.34
+31.3%

Core i7-14700HX outperforms Core i9-12900HK by 31% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i9-12900HK 27498
i7-14700HX 36103
+31.3%

Core i7-14700HX outperforms Core i9-12900HK by 31% in Passmark.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

i9-12900HK 9397
i7-14700HX 11767
+25.2%

Core i7-14700HX outperforms Core i9-12900HK by 25% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i9-12900HK 49924
i7-14700HX 68172
+36.6%

Core i7-14700HX outperforms Core i9-12900HK by 37% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i9-12900HK 15598
i7-14700HX 18104
+16.1%

Core i7-14700HX outperforms Core i9-12900HK by 16% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

i9-12900HK 3.41
i7-14700HX 2.69
+26.8%

Core i9-12900HK outperforms Core i7-14700HX by 27% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

i9-12900HK 27
+161%
i7-14700HX 10

Core i9-12900HK outperforms Core i7-14700HX by 161% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

i9-12900HK 2836
i7-14700HX 3780
+33.3%

Core i7-14700HX outperforms Core i9-12900HK by 33% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

i9-12900HK 270
+0.4%
i7-14700HX 269

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

i9-12900HK 3.26
i7-14700HX 3.63
+11.3%

Core i7-14700HX outperforms Core i9-12900HK by 11% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i9-12900HK 14.1
i7-14700HX 19.3
+36.9%

Core i7-14700HX outperforms Core i9-12900HK by 37% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i9-12900HK 8735
i7-14700HX 10202
+16.8%

Core i7-14700HX outperforms Core i9-12900HK by 17% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i9-12900HK 125
i7-14700HX 177
+41.6%

Core i7-14700HX outperforms Core i9-12900HK by 42% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i9-12900HK 300
i7-14700HX 365
+21.6%

Core i7-14700HX outperforms Core i9-12900HK by 22% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.78 23.34
Integrated graphics card 9.43 6.15
Recency 4 January 2022 9 January 2024
Physical cores 14 20
Threads 20 28
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 55 Watt

i9-12900HK has 53.3% faster integrated GPU, and 22.2% lower power consumption.

i7-14700HX, on the other hand, has a 31.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and 42.9% more physical cores and 40% more threads.

The Core i7-14700HX is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i9-12900HK in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-12900HK and Core i7-14700HX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-12900HK
Core i9-12900HK
Intel Core i7-14700HX
Core i7-14700HX

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 58 votes

Rate Core i9-12900HK on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 76 votes

Rate Core i7-14700HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-12900HK or Core i7-14700HX, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.