Ultra 7 258V vs i9-11900KB

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-11900KB
2021
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
14.42
+15.6%
Core Ultra 7 258V
2024
8 cores / 8 threads, 17 Watt
12.47

Core i9-11900KB outperforms Core Ultra 7 258V by a moderate 16% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-11900KB and Core Ultra 7 258V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking501625
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation17.86no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Power efficiency20.9969.42
Architecture codenameTiger Lake-H (2021)Lunar Lake (2024)
Release dateMay 2021 (3 years ago)24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$539no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i9-11900KB and Core Ultra 7 258V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Performance-coresno data4
Low Power Efficient-coresno data4
Threads168
Base clock speed3.3 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.9 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/s37 MHz
L1 cache80K (per core)192 KB (per core)
L2 cache1.25 MB (per core)2.5 MB (per core)
L3 cache24 MB (shared)12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm SuperFin3 nm
Die size190 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-11900KB and Core Ultra 7 258V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1787FCBGA2833
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-11900KB and Core Ultra 7 258V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0++
Deep Learning Boost++
Supported AI Software Frameworks-OpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN

Security technologies

Core i9-11900KB and Core Ultra 7 258V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-11900KB and Core Ultra 7 258V are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-11900KB and Core Ultra 7 258V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5
Maximum memory size128 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth51.2 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics for 11th Gen Intel ProcessorsIntel Arc Graphics 140V
Quick Sync Video++
Graphics max frequency1.45 GHz1.95 GHz
Execution Units32no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i9-11900KB and Core Ultra 7 258V integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported43

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i9-11900KB and Core Ultra 7 258V integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@60Hz4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)
Max resolution over eDP4096 x 2304@60Hz3840x2400 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680x4320@60Hz7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i9-11900KB and Core Ultra 7 258V integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212.2
OpenGL4.64.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-11900KB and Core Ultra 7 258V.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes204
PCI supportno data5.0 and 4.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-11900KB 14.42
+15.6%
Ultra 7 258V 12.47

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i9-11900KB 22911
+15.6%
Ultra 7 258V 19813

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

i9-11900KB 9538
Ultra 7 258V 9982
+4.7%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

i9-11900KB 50665
+38.9%
Ultra 7 258V 36479

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

i9-11900KB 14961
+39.9%
Ultra 7 258V 10693

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

i9-11900KB 22
+12.3%
Ultra 7 258V 20

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

i9-11900KB 2027
+27.3%
Ultra 7 258V 1593

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

i9-11900KB 247
Ultra 7 258V 270
+9.3%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

i9-11900KB 2.84
Ultra 7 258V 3.36
+18.3%

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

i9-11900KB 11.6
+52.6%
Ultra 7 258V 7.6

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

i9-11900KB 9584
+12.3%
Ultra 7 258V 8536

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

i9-11900KB 8924
Ultra 7 258V 9723
+9%

Blender(-)

i9-11900KB 263
Ultra 7 258V 374
+42.2%

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

i9-11900KB 1656
Ultra 7 258V 1973
+19.1%

7-Zip Single

i9-11900KB 5979
+7.7%
Ultra 7 258V 5553

7-Zip

i9-11900KB 50152
+39%
Ultra 7 258V 36068

WebXPRT 3

i9-11900KB 269
Ultra 7 258V 270
+0.2%

CrossMark Overall

i9-11900KB 1785
+6.9%
Ultra 7 258V 1670

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.42 12.47
Integrated graphics card 5.58 13.27
Threads 16 8
Chip lithography 10 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 17 Watt

i9-11900KB has a 15.6% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more threads.

Ultra 7 258V, on the other hand, has 137.8% faster integrated GPU, a 233.3% more advanced lithography process, and 282.4% lower power consumption.

The Core i9-11900KB is our recommended choice as it beats the Core Ultra 7 258V in performance tests.

Note that Core i9-11900KB is a desktop processor while Core Ultra 7 258V is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-11900KB and Core Ultra 7 258V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-11900KB
Core i9-11900KB
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
Core Ultra 7 258V

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.7 63 votes

Rate Core i9-11900KB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 14 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 258V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-11900KB or Core Ultra 7 258V, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.