Celeron J4125 vs i9-10980HK

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-10980HK
2020
8 cores / 16 threads, 45 Watt
10.73
+477%
Celeron J4125
2019
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
1.86

Core i9-10980HK outperforms Celeron J4125 by a whopping 477% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-10980HK and Celeron J4125 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking7291998
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data5.56
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Comet Lakeno data
Power efficiency22.5717.60
Architecture codenameComet Lake-H (2020)Gemini Lake Refresh (2019)
Release date2 April 2020 (4 years ago)4 November 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$583$107

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i9-10980HK and Celeron J4125 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads164
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz2.7 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)56 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)4 MB (shared)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)4 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data93 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-10980HK and Celeron J4125 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1440FCBGA1090
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-10980HK and Celeron J4125. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
Smart Responseno data-
GPIOno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+-

Security technologies

Core i9-10980HK and Celeron J4125 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX-+
Identity Protection++
SGXYes with Intel® MEYes with Intel® ME
OS Guard++
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-10980HK and Celeron J4125 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-10980HK and Celeron J4125. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4
Maximum memory size128 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth45.8 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics for 10th Gen Intel ProcessorsIntel UHD Graphics 600
Max video memoryno data8 GB
Quick Sync Video++
Graphics max frequency1.25 GHz750 MHz
Execution Unitsno data12

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i9-10980HK and Celeron J4125 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
DVI+no data
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i9-10980HK and Celeron J4125 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support++
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2304@30Hz4096x2160@30Hz
Max resolution over eDP4096 x 2304@60Hz4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096 x 2304@60Hz4096x2160@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i9-10980HK and Celeron J4125 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212
OpenGL4.54.4

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-10980HK and Celeron J4125.

PCIe version4.02.0
PCI Express lanes166
USB revisionno data2.0/3.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-10980HK 10.73
+477%
Celeron J4125 1.86

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i9-10980HK 17037
+476%
Celeron J4125 2957

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

i9-10980HK 13765
+268%
Celeron J4125 3740

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

i9-10980HK 1737
+615%
Celeron J4125 243

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

i9-10980HK 206
+174%
Celeron J4125 75

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

i9-10980HK 10.1
+461%
Celeron J4125 1.8

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

i9-10980HK 6869
+555%
Celeron J4125 1048

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

i9-10980HK 98
+652%
Celeron J4125 13

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

i9-10980HK 239
+289%
Celeron J4125 61

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

i9-10980HK 8156
+485%
Celeron J4125 1394

Blender(-)

i9-10980HK 279
Celeron J4125 2391
+757%

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

i9-10980HK 1348
+196%
Celeron J4125 455

7-Zip Single

i9-10980HK 5437
+130%
Celeron J4125 2369

7-Zip

i9-10980HK 47455
+533%
Celeron J4125 7494

WebXPRT 3

i9-10980HK 243
+174%
Celeron J4125 89

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.73 1.86
Integrated graphics card 5.58 0.87
Recency 2 April 2020 4 November 2019
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 16 4
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 10 Watt

i9-10980HK has a 476.9% higher aggregate performance score, 541.4% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 4 months, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

Celeron J4125, on the other hand, has 350% lower power consumption.

The Core i9-10980HK is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J4125 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i9-10980HK is a notebook processor while Celeron J4125 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-10980HK and Celeron J4125, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-10980HK
Core i9-10980HK
Intel Celeron J4125
Celeron J4125

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 209 votes

Rate Core i9-10980HK on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 1529 votes

Rate Celeron J4125 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-10980HK or Celeron J4125, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.