Xeon w9-3595X vs i9-10900X

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-10900X
2019
10 cores / 20 threads, 165 Watt
14.68
Xeon w9-3595X
2024
60 cores / 120 threads, 385 Watt
64.85
+342%

Xeon w9-3595X outperforms Core i9-10900X by a whopping 342% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-10900X and Xeon w9-3595X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking51112
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data20.04
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency8.1115.36
Architecture codenameCascade Lake-X (2019)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date19 October 2019 (5 years ago)24 August 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$5,889

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i9-10900X and Xeon w9-3595X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)60 (Hexaconta-Core)
Threads20120
Base clock speed3.7 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.7 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/s DMI3 MHzno data
L1 cache64K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache19.25 MB (shared)112.5 MB
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data4x 477 mm2
Maximum core temperature94 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data81 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-10900X and Xeon w9-3595X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA2066FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt385 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-10900X and Xeon w9-3595X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0++
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Core i9-10900X and Xeon w9-3595X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-10900X and Xeon w9-3595X are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-10900X and Xeon w9-3595X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size256 GB4 TB
Max memory channels48
Maximum memory bandwidth94 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-10900X and Xeon w9-3595X.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes48112

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-10900X 14.68
Xeon w9-3595X 64.85
+342%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i9-10900X 22473
Xeon w9-3595X 99239
+342%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.68 64.85
Recency 19 October 2019 24 August 2024
Physical cores 10 60
Threads 20 120
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 385 Watt

i9-10900X has 133.3% lower power consumption.

Xeon w9-3595X, on the other hand, has a 341.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads.

The Xeon w9-3595X is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i9-10900X in performance tests.

Note that Core i9-10900X is a desktop processor while Xeon w9-3595X is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-10900X and Xeon w9-3595X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-10900X
Core i9-10900X
Intel Xeon w9-3595X
Xeon w9-3595X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.4 997 votes

Rate Core i9-10900X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 35 votes

Rate Xeon w9-3595X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-10900X or Xeon w9-3595X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.