Ryzen 7 9700X vs i9-10900F

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-10900F
2020
10 cores / 20 threads, 65 Watt
12.55
Ryzen 7 9700X
2024
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
23.47
+87%

Ryzen 7 9700X outperforms Core i9-10900F by an impressive 87% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-10900F and Ryzen 7 9700X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking608218
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data50.99
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency18.2734.17
Architecture codenameComet Lake (2020)Granite Ridge (2024)
Release date30 April 2020 (4 years ago)8 August 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$359

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i9-10900F and Ryzen 7 9700X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads2016
Base clock speed2.8 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz5.5 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache20 MB (shared)32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data70.6 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C95 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data8,315 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-10900F and Ryzen 7 9700X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1200AM5
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-10900F and Ryzen 7 9700X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core i9-10900F and Ryzen 7 9700X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-10900F and Ryzen 7 9700X are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-10900F and Ryzen 7 9700X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR5
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth45.8 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon Graphics

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-10900F and Ryzen 7 9700X.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes1624

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-10900F 12.55
Ryzen 7 9700X 23.47
+87%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i9-10900F 19941
Ryzen 7 9700X 37280
+87%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.55 23.47
Recency 30 April 2020 8 August 2024
Physical cores 10 8
Threads 20 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm

i9-10900F has 25% more physical cores and 25% more threads.

Ryzen 7 9700X, on the other hand, has a 87% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 7 9700X is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i9-10900F in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-10900F and Ryzen 7 9700X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-10900F
Core i9-10900F
AMD Ryzen 7 9700X
Ryzen 7 9700X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 335 votes

Rate Core i9-10900F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 240 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 9700X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-10900F or Ryzen 7 9700X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.