i9-10850K vs i9-10885H

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-10885H
2020
8 cores / 16 threads, 45 Watt
9.31
Core i9-10850K
2020
10 cores / 20 threads, 125 Watt
14.05
+50.9%

Core i9-10850K outperforms Core i9-10885H by an impressive 51% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-10885H and Core i9-10850K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking825523
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data17.15
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Comet Lakeno data
Power efficiency19.5810.64
Architecture codenameComet Lake-H (2020)Comet Lake-S (2020)
Release date2 April 2020 (4 years ago)27 July 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$556$453

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i9-10885H and Core i9-10850K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads1620
Base clock speed2.4 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/s8 GT/s
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache12 MB (shared)20 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size206 mm2206 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-10885H and Core i9-10850K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1440FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-10885H and Core i9-10850K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPP+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0++

Security technologies

Core i9-10885H and Core i9-10850K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
Identity Protection++
SGXYes with Intel® MEYes with Intel® ME
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-10885H and Core i9-10850K are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-10885H and Core i9-10850K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4-2933
Maximum memory size128 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth45.8 GB/s45.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics for 10th Gen Intel ProcessorsIntel UHD Graphics 630
Max video memoryno data64 GB
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequency1.25 GHz1.2 GHz
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i9-10885H and Core i9-10850K integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
DVI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i9-10885H and Core i9-10850K integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support++
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2304@30Hz4096 x 2160@30Hz
Max resolution over eDP4096 x 2304@60Hz4096 x 2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096 x 2304@60Hz4096 x 2304@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i9-10885H and Core i9-10850K integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212
OpenGL4.54.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-10885H and Core i9-10850K.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-10885H 9.31
i9-10850K 14.05
+50.9%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i9-10885H 14794
i9-10850K 22325
+50.9%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i9-10885H 1492
i9-10850K 1758
+17.8%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i9-10885H 6361
i9-10850K 9037
+42.1%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

i9-10885H 3.86
i9-10850K 2.67
+44.6%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

i9-10885H 1517
i9-10850K 2457
+62%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

i9-10885H 211
i9-10850K 215
+1.9%

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

i9-10885H 9.9
i9-10850K 14.5
+46.5%

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

i9-10885H 6420
i9-10850K 9424
+46.8%

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

i9-10885H 81
i9-10850K 147
+82%

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

i9-10885H 218
i9-10850K 286
+31.1%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

i9-10885H 6914
i9-10850K 11436
+65.4%

Blender(-)

i9-10885H 302
+66.7%
i9-10850K 181

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

i9-10885H 1317
i9-10850K 1401
+6.4%

7-Zip Single

i9-10885H 5589
i9-10850K 5914
+5.8%

7-Zip

i9-10885H 41823
i9-10850K 70932
+69.6%

WebXPRT 3

i9-10885H 234
i9-10850K 253
+8.1%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.31 14.05
Integrated graphics card 5.58 3.09
Recency 2 April 2020 27 July 2020
Physical cores 8 10
Threads 16 20
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 125 Watt

i9-10885H has 80.6% faster integrated GPU, and 177.8% lower power consumption.

i9-10850K, on the other hand, has a 50.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 months, and 25% more physical cores and 25% more threads.

The Core i9-10850K is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i9-10885H in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i9-10885H is a notebook processor while Core i9-10850K is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-10885H and Core i9-10850K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-10885H
Core i9-10885H
Intel Core i9-10850K
Core i9-10850K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 113 votes

Rate Core i9-10885H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 497 votes

Rate Core i9-10850K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-10885H or Core i9-10850K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.