i3-12100F vs i9-10880H

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-10880H
2020
8 cores / 16 threads, 45 Watt
9.22
+3.9%
Core i3-12100F
2022
4 cores / 8 threads, 58 Watt
8.87

Core i9-10880H outperforms Core i3-12100F by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-10880H and Core i3-12100F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking834868
Place by popularitynot in top-1005
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Comet Lakeno data
Power efficiency19.3814.46
Architecture codenameComet Lake-H (2020)Alder Lake-S (2022)
Release date2 April 2020 (4 years ago)January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core i9-10880H and Core i3-12100F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads168
Base clock speed2.3 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz4.3 GHz
L1 cache512 KB80K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache16 MB12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data163 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-10880H and Core i3-12100F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFCBGA1440FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt58 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-10880H and Core i3-12100F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Core i9-10880H and Core i3-12100F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-10880H and Core i3-12100F are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-10880H and Core i3-12100F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data76.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1200 MHz)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-10880H and Core i3-12100F.

PCIe versionno data5.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-10880H 9.22
+3.9%
i3-12100F 8.87

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i9-10880H 14642
+3.9%
i3-12100F 14096

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.22 8.87
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 16 8
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 58 Watt

i9-10880H has a 3.9% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 28.9% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core i9-10880H and Core i3-12100F.

Be aware that Core i9-10880H is a notebook processor while Core i3-12100F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-10880H and Core i3-12100F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-10880H
Core i9-10880H
Intel Core i3-12100F
Core i3-12100F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 61 vote

Rate Core i9-10880H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 8257 votes

Rate Core i3-12100F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-10880H or Core i3-12100F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.