Xeon X5670 vs i7-980X

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-980X
2010
6 cores / 12 threads, 130 Watt
4.30
+12%
Xeon X5670
2010
6 cores / 12 threads, 95 Watt
3.84

Core i7-980X outperforms Xeon X5670 by a moderate 12% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-980X and Xeon X5670 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking13681465
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.241.06
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataXeon (Desktop)
Power efficiency3.133.82
Architecture codenameGulftown (2010−2011)Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
Release date16 March 2010 (14 years ago)16 March 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$959$67

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon X5670 has 342% better value for money than i7-980X.

Detailed specifications

Core i7-980X and Xeon X5670 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads1212
Base clock speed3.33 GHz2.93 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz3.33 GHz
Bus rate6.4 GT/s6400 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB (shared)12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size239 mm2239 mm2
Maximum core temperature68 °C81 °C
Number of transistors1,170 million1,170 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-980X and Xeon X5670 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCLGA1366FCLGA1366,LGA1366
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-980X and Xeon X5670. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.01.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States++
Demand Based Switching-+
PAE36 Bit40 Bit

Security technologies

Core i7-980X and Xeon X5670 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-980X and Xeon X5670 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-980X and Xeon X5670. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size24 GB288 GB
Max memory channels33
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s32 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-980X and Xeon X5670.

PCIe version2.02.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-980X 4.30
+12%
Xeon X5670 3.84

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-980X 6826
+11.8%
Xeon X5670 6105

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i7-980X 551
+12.2%
Xeon X5670 491

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i7-980X 2588
+13.5%
Xeon X5670 2280

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.30 3.84
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 95 Watt

i7-980X has a 12% higher aggregate performance score.

Xeon X5670, on the other hand, has 36.8% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-980X is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon X5670 in performance tests.

Note that Core i7-980X is a desktop processor while Xeon X5670 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-980X and Xeon X5670, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-980X
Core i7-980X
Intel Xeon X5670
Xeon X5670

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 111 votes

Rate Core i7-980X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 482 votes

Rate Xeon X5670 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-980X or Xeon X5670, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.