Ryzen 5 3500U vs i7-975

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-975
2009
4 cores / 8 threads, 130 Watt
2.28
Ryzen 5 3500U
2019
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
4.54
+99.1%

Ryzen 5 3500U outperforms Core i7-975 by an impressive 99% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-975 and Ryzen 5 3500U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking18301342
Place by popularitynot in top-10036
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.10no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesCore i7 (Desktop)AMD Ryzen 5
Power efficiency1.6027.60
Architecture codenameBloomfield (2008−2010)Picasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020)
Release date2 June 2009 (15 years ago)6 January 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$476no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-975 and Ryzen 5 3500U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speed3.33 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus typeno dataPCIe 3.0
Bus rate1333 MHzno data
Multiplierno data21
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm12 nm
Die size263 mm2209.78 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)68 °Cno data
Number of transistors731 million4940 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-975 and Ryzen 5 3500U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1366FP5
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-975 and Ryzen 5 3500U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE36 Bitno data

Security technologies

Core i7-975 and Ryzen 5 3500U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-975 and Ryzen 5 3500U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-975 and Ryzen 5 3500U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size24 GB64 GB
Max memory channels32
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-975 and Ryzen 5 3500U.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data12

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-975 2.28
Ryzen 5 3500U 4.54
+99.1%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-975 3493
Ryzen 5 3500U 6941
+98.7%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i7-975 539
Ryzen 5 3500U 862
+59.9%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i7-975 1884
Ryzen 5 3500U 2477
+31.5%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

i7-975 4101
Ryzen 5 3500U 4558
+11.1%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

i7-975 16628
Ryzen 5 3500U 17231
+3.6%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

i7-975 5837
Ryzen 5 3500U 5951
+2%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

i7-975 7.36
+75%
Ryzen 5 3500U 12.88

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

i7-975 6
Ryzen 5 3500U 8
+27%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.28 4.54
Recency 2 June 2009 6 January 2019
Chip lithography 45 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen 5 3500U has a 99.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 275% more advanced lithography process, and 766.7% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 5 3500U is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-975 in performance tests.

Note that Core i7-975 is a desktop processor while Ryzen 5 3500U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-975 and Ryzen 5 3500U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-975
Core i7-975
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
Ryzen 5 3500U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 25 votes

Rate Core i7-975 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 8627 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 3500U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-975 or Ryzen 5 3500U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.