EPYC 72F3 vs i7-9700KF

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-9700KF
2019
8 cores / 8 threads, 95 Watt
8.97
EPYC 72F3
2021
8 cores / 16 threads, 180 Watt
17.16
+91.3%

EPYC 72F3 outperforms Core i7-9700KF by an impressive 91% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-9700KF and EPYC 72F3 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking859374
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.834.59
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesIntel Core i7AMD EPYC
Power efficiency8.949.02
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake (2017−2019)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date8 January 2019 (5 years ago)15 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$374$2,468

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i7-9700KF has 71% better value for money than EPYC 72F3.

Detailed specifications

Core i7-9700KF and EPYC 72F3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads816
Base clock speed3.6 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed4.9 GHz4.1 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier3637
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm+
Die sizeno data8x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data33,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-9700KF and EPYC 72F3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketFCLGA1151SP3
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt180 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-9700KF and EPYC 72F3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
SIPP+-

Security technologies

Core i7-9700KF and EPYC 72F3 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-9700KF and EPYC 72F3 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-9700KF and EPYC 72F3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size128 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/s204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-9700KF and EPYC 72F3.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes16128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-9700KF 8.97
EPYC 72F3 17.16
+91.3%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-9700KF 14254
EPYC 72F3 27252
+91.2%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.97 17.16
Recency 8 January 2019 15 March 2021
Threads 8 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 180 Watt

i7-9700KF has 89.5% lower power consumption.

EPYC 72F3, on the other hand, has a 91.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 72F3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-9700KF in performance tests.

Note that Core i7-9700KF is a desktop processor while EPYC 72F3 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-9700KF and EPYC 72F3, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-9700KF
Core i7-9700KF
AMD EPYC 72F3
EPYC 72F3

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 427 votes

Rate Core i7-9700KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 6 votes

Rate EPYC 72F3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-9700KF or EPYC 72F3, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.