Xeon W-11955M vs i7-9700K

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-9700K
2018
8 cores / 8 threads, 95 Watt
9.10
Xeon W-11955M
2021
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
14.16
+55.6%

Xeon W-11955M outperforms Core i7-9700K by an impressive 56% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-9700K and Xeon W-11955M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking843517
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.4747.66
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesIntel Core i7Intel Tiger Lake
Power efficiency9.0238.09
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake-R (2018−2019)Tiger Lake-H (2021)
Release date8 October 2018 (6 years ago)11 May 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$374$623

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon W-11955M has 538% better value for money than i7-9700K.

Detailed specifications

Core i7-9700K and Xeon W-11955M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads816
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed4.9 GHz5 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s8 GT/s
Multiplier36no data
L1 cache512 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB (shared)24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm SuperFin
Die size178 mm2190 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-9700K and Xeon W-11955M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketLGA-1151FCBGA1787
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-9700K and Xeon W-11955M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data+
SIPP++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Core i7-9700K and Xeon W-11955M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
Secure Key++
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® ME-
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-9700K and Xeon W-11955M are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-9700K and Xeon W-11955M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4
Maximum memory size128 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/s51.2 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics 630Intel UHD Graphics for 11th Gen Intel Processors
Max video memory64 GBno data
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.2 GHz1.45 GHz
Execution Unitsno data32
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-9700K and Xeon W-11955M integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported34

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i7-9700K and Xeon W-11955M integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2304@24Hz4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over eDP4096 x 2304@60Hz4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096 x 2304@60Hz7680x4320@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i7-9700K and Xeon W-11955M integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212.1
OpenGL4.54.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-9700K and Xeon W-11955M.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-9700K 9.10
Xeon W-11955M 14.16
+55.6%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-9700K 14452
Xeon W-11955M 22493
+55.6%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i7-9700K 1693
Xeon W-11955M 2055
+21.4%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i7-9700K 7186
Xeon W-11955M 8875
+23.5%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

i7-9700K 1449
Xeon W-11955M 1846
+27.4%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

i7-9700K 206
Xeon W-11955M 230
+11.9%

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

i7-9700K 8.1
Xeon W-11955M 8.6
+6.2%

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

i7-9700K 7396
Xeon W-11955M 8815
+19.2%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

i7-9700K 7440
Xeon W-11955M 9058
+21.7%

Blender(-)

i7-9700K 307
+11.2%
Xeon W-11955M 276

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

i7-9700K 1300
Xeon W-11955M 1587
+22%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.10 14.16
Integrated graphics card 3.09 5.58
Recency 8 October 2018 11 May 2021
Threads 8 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 35 Watt

Xeon W-11955M has a 55.6% higher aggregate performance score, 80.6% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more threads, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 171.4% lower power consumption.

The Xeon W-11955M is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-9700K in performance tests.

Note that Core i7-9700K is a desktop processor while Xeon W-11955M is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-9700K and Xeon W-11955M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-9700K
Core i7-9700K
Intel Xeon W-11955M
Xeon W-11955M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 2177 votes

Rate Core i7-9700K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 24 votes

Rate Xeon W-11955M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-9700K or Xeon W-11955M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.