Xeon E5-2697 v2 vs i7-9700K

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-9700K
2018
8 cores / 8 threads, 95 Watt
9.14
+1.3%
Xeon E5-2697 v2
2013
12 cores / 24 threads, 130 Watt
9.02

Core i7-9700K outperforms Xeon E5-2697 v2 by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-9700K and Xeon E5-2697 v2 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking835847
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.131.92
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesIntel Core i7Intel Xeon (Desktop)
Power efficiency9.076.54
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake-R (2018−2019)Ivy Bridge-EP (2013)
Release date8 October 2018 (6 years ago)1 September 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$374$1,723

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i7-9700K has 271% better value for money than Xeon E5-2697 v2.

Detailed specifications

Core i7-9700K and Xeon E5-2697 v2 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads824
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed4.9 GHz3.5 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s8GT/s
Multiplier36no data
L1 cache512 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB256K (per core)
L3 cache12 MB (shared)30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Die size178 mm2160 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C86 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data1,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-9700K and Xeon E5-2697 v2 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketLGA-1151FCLGA2011
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt130 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-9700K and Xeon E5-2697 v2. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® AVX
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data-
SIPP+-
Demand Based Switchingno data+
PAEno data46 Bit

Security technologies

Core i7-9700K and Xeon E5-2697 v2 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-9700K and Xeon E5-2697 v2 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-9700K and Xeon E5-2697 v2. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3
Maximum memory size128 GB768 GB
Max memory channels24
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/s59.7 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 630no data
Max video memory64 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.2 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-9700K and Xeon E5-2697 v2 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i7-9700K and Xeon E5-2697 v2 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096 x 2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096 x 2304@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i7-9700K and Xeon E5-2697 v2 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-9700K and Xeon E5-2697 v2.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1640

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-9700K 9.14
+1.3%
Xeon E5-2697 v2 9.02

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-9700K 14459
+1.2%
Xeon E5-2697 v2 14281

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i7-9700K 1694
+205%
Xeon E5-2697 v2 555

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i7-9700K 7192
+65.8%
Xeon E5-2697 v2 4337

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

i7-9700K 7653
+83.4%
Xeon E5-2697 v2 4173

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

i7-9700K 42778
+23%
Xeon E5-2697 v2 34776

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

i7-9700K 12928
+46.2%
Xeon E5-2697 v2 8843

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

i7-9700K 4.49
+174%
Xeon E5-2697 v2 12.31

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

i7-9700K 16
Xeon E5-2697 v2 18
+11.2%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

i7-9700K 1449
Xeon E5-2697 v2 1550
+7%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

i7-9700K 206
+95.7%
Xeon E5-2697 v2 105

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

i7-9700K 2.37
+89.6%
Xeon E5-2697 v2 1.25

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

i7-9700K 8.1
Xeon E5-2697 v2 8.7
+7.4%

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

i7-9700K 95
+11.3%
Xeon E5-2697 v2 85

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

i7-9700K 270
+63.8%
Xeon E5-2697 v2 165

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

i7-9700K 7396
+1.7%
Xeon E5-2697 v2 7269

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.14 9.02
Recency 8 October 2018 1 September 2013
Physical cores 8 12
Threads 8 24
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 130 Watt

i7-9700K has a 1.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 36.8% lower power consumption.

Xeon E5-2697 v2, on the other hand, has 50% more physical cores and 200% more threads.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core i7-9700K and Xeon E5-2697 v2.

Note that Core i7-9700K is a desktop processor while Xeon E5-2697 v2 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-9700K and Xeon E5-2697 v2, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-9700K
Core i7-9700K
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2
Xeon E5-2697 v2

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 2151 vote

Rate Core i7-9700K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 757 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2697 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-9700K or Xeon E5-2697 v2, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.