Processor N200 vs i7-965

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-965
2008
4 cores / 8 threads, 130 Watt
2.16
+38.5%
Processor N200
2023
4 cores / 4 threads, 6 Watt
1.56

Core i7-965 outperforms Processor N200 by a substantial 38% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-965 and Processor N200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking18482107
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.45no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Alder Lake-N
Power efficiency1.5724.50
Architecture codenameBloomfield (2008−2010)Alder Lake-N (2023)
Release dateNovember 2008 (16 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,509$193

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-965 and Processor N200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed3.2 GHz0.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.46 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus rate6.4 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)96 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)2 MB (shared)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm10 nm
Die size263 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature68 °C105 °C
Number of transistors731 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-965 and Processor N200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1366Intel BGA 1264
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-965 and Processor N200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE36 Bitno data

Security technologies

Core i7-965 and Processor N200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-965 and Processor N200 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-965 and Processor N200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel
Maximum memory size24 GBno data
Max memory channels3no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-965 and Processor N200.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data9

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.16 1.56
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 45 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 6 Watt

i7-965 has a 38.5% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more threads.

Processor N200, on the other hand, has a 350% more advanced lithography process, and 2066.7% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-965 is our recommended choice as it beats the Processor N200 in performance tests.

Note that Core i7-965 is a desktop processor while Processor N200 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-965 and Processor N200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-965
Core i7-965
Intel Processor N200
Processor N200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 24 votes

Rate Core i7-965 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 145 votes

Rate Processor N200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-965 or Processor N200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.