Celeron J4105 vs i7-960

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-960
2009
4 cores / 8 threads, 130 Watt
2.11
+15.3%
Celeron J4105
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
1.83

Core i7-960 outperforms Celeron J4105 by a moderate 15% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-960 and Celeron J4105 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking18812011
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.172.07
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesCore i7 (Desktop)Intel Celeron
Power efficiency1.5417.32
Architecture codenameBloomfield (2008−2010)Goldmont Plus (2017)
Release date20 October 2009 (15 years ago)11 December 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$316$107

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Celeron J4105 has 1118% better value for money than i7-960.

Detailed specifications

Core i7-960 and Celeron J4105 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed3.2 GHz1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.46 GHz2.5 GHz
Bus rate1333 MHzno data
Multiplierno data15
L1 cache64 KB (per core)56 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)4 MB (shared)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)4 MB
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Die size263 mm293 mm2
Maximum core temperature68 °C105 °C
Number of transistors731 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-960 and Celeron J4105 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1366FCBGA1090
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-960 and Celeron J4105. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data-
Turbo Boost Technology1.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring-+
Smart Responseno data-
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
GPIOno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-

Security technologies

Core i7-960 and Celeron J4105 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-960 and Celeron J4105 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-960 and Celeron J4105. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size24 GB8 GB
Max memory channels32
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s38.397 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AIntel UHD Graphics 600
Max video memoryno data8 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data750 MHz
Execution Unitsno data12

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-960 and Celeron J4105 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i7-960 and Celeron J4105 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i7-960 and Celeron J4105 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.4

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-960 and Celeron J4105.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanesno data6
USB revisionno data2.0/3.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-960 2.11
+15.3%
Celeron J4105 1.83

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-960 3351
+15.6%
Celeron J4105 2900

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i7-960 489
+50.5%
Celeron J4105 325

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i7-960 1651
+78.7%
Celeron J4105 924

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.11 1.83
Recency 20 October 2009 11 December 2017
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 10 Watt

i7-960 has a 15.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more threads.

Celeron J4105, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 1200% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-960 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J4105 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-960 and Celeron J4105, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-960
Core i7-960
Intel Celeron J4105
Celeron J4105

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 150 votes

Rate Core i7-960 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 311 votes

Rate Celeron J4105 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-960 or Celeron J4105, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.