PRO A6-8570 vs i7-950

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-950
2009
4 cores / 8 threads, 130 Watt
2.03
+69.2%
PRO A6-8570
2018
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
1.20

Core i7-950 outperforms PRO A6-8570 by an impressive 69% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-950 and PRO A6-8570 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19092335
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.13no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesCore i7 (Desktop)no data
Power efficiency1.481.75
Architecture codenameBloomfield (2008−2010)Carrizo (2015−2018)
Release date2 June 2009 (15 years ago)October 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$290no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-950 and PRO A6-8570 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed3.06 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.33 GHz3.8 GHz
Bus rate1333 MHzno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1024 KB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography45 nm28 nm
Die size263 mm2250 mm2
Maximum core temperature68 °Cno data
Number of transistors731 million3,100 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-950 and PRO A6-8570 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1366AM4
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-950 and PRO A6-8570. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
FRTC-+
FreeSync-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE36 Bitno data

Security technologies

Core i7-950 and PRO A6-8570 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-950 and PRO A6-8570 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-950 and PRO A6-8570. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2400
Maximum memory size24 GBno data
Max memory channels32
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon R5 Graphics
iGPU core countno data6
Switchable graphics-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-950 and PRO A6-8570 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-n/a

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i7-950 and PRO A6-8570 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-950 and PRO A6-8570.

PCIe version2.03.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-950 2.03
+69.2%
PRO A6-8570 1.20

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-950 3217
+68.8%
PRO A6-8570 1906

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.03 1.20
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 65 Watt

i7-950 has a 69.2% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

PRO A6-8570, on the other hand, has a 60.7% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-950 is our recommended choice as it beats the PRO A6-8570 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-950 and PRO A6-8570, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-950
Core i7-950
AMD PRO A6-8570
PRO A6-8570

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 336 votes

Rate Core i7-950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 32 votes

Rate PRO A6-8570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-950 or PRO A6-8570, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.