i3-6100 vs i7-950

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-950
2009
4 cores / 8 threads, 130 Watt
2.10
Core i3-6100
2015
2 cores / 4 threads, 51 Watt
2.79
+32.9%

Core i3-6100 outperforms Core i7-950 by a substantial 33% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-950 and Core i3-6100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19061699
Place by popularitynot in top-10090
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.140.65
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesCore i7 (Desktop)Intel Core i3
Power efficiency1.474.99
Architecture codenameBloomfield (2008−2010)Skylake (2015−2016)
Release date2 June 2009 (15 years ago)1 September 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$290$117

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i3-6100 has 364% better value for money than i7-950.

Detailed specifications

Core i7-950 and Core i3-6100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads84
Base clock speed3.06 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.33 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rate1333 MHz4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data37
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512 KB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)3 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Die size263 mm298.57 mm2
Maximum core temperature68 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data65 °C
Number of transistors731 million1,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-950 and Core i3-6100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1366FCLGA1151
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt51 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-950 and Core i3-6100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE36 Bitno data

Security technologies

Core i7-950 and Core i3-6100 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-950 and Core i3-6100 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-950 and Core i3-6100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size24 GB64 GB
Max memory channels32
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s34.134 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AIntel HD Graphics 530
Max video memoryno data64 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.05 GHz
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-950 and Core i3-6100 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
DVIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i7-950 and Core i3-6100 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2304@24Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over VGAno dataN/A

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i7-950 and Core i3-6100 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-950 and Core i3-6100.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-950 2.10
i3-6100 2.79
+32.9%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-950 3215
i3-6100 4270
+32.8%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i7-950 467
i3-6100 1213
+160%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i7-950 1556
i3-6100 2372
+52.4%

3DMark Fire Strike Physics

i7-950 4900
i3-6100 6220
+26.9%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.10 2.79
Recency 2 June 2009 1 September 2015
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 51 Watt

i7-950 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

i3-6100, on the other hand, has a 32.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 154.9% lower power consumption.

The Core i3-6100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-950 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-950 and Core i3-6100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-950
Core i7-950
Intel Core i3-6100
Core i3-6100

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 333 votes

Rate Core i7-950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 1498 votes

Rate Core i3-6100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-950 or Core i3-6100, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.