A10-9700E vs i7-930

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-930
2010
4 cores / 8 threads, 130 Watt
1.87
A10-9700E
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
2.04
+9.1%

A10-9700E outperforms Core i7-930 by a small 9% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-930 and A10-9700E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19921909
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.24no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.355.49
Architecture codenameBloomfield (2008−2010)Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date28 February 2010 (14 years ago)27 July 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$80no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-930 and A10-9700E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed2.8 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.06 GHz3.5 GHz
Bus rate4.8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)2048 KB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm28 nm
Die size263 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature68 °C90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data74 °C
Number of transistors731 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-930 and A10-9700E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1366AM4
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-930 and A10-9700E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
FRTC-+
FreeSync-+
PowerTune-+
TrueAudio-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
VirusProtect-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE36 Bitno data

Security technologies

Core i7-930 and A10-9700E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-930 and A10-9700E are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-930 and A10-9700E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2400
Maximum memory size24 GBno data
Max memory channels32
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R7 Graphics
iGPU core countno data6
Enduro-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-930 and A10-9700E integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i7-930 and A10-9700E integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-930 and A10-9700E.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data8

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-930 1.87
A10-9700E 2.04
+9.1%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-930 2967
A10-9700E 3242
+9.3%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.87 2.04
Recency 28 February 2010 27 July 2017
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 45 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 35 Watt

i7-930 has 100% more threads.

A10-9700E, on the other hand, has a 9.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 60.7% more advanced lithography process, and 271.4% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core i7-930 and A10-9700E.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-930 and A10-9700E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-930
Core i7-930
AMD A10-9700E
A10-9700E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 208 votes

Rate Core i7-930 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 53 votes

Rate A10-9700E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-930 or A10-9700E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.