Xeon 5160 vs i7-920

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-920
2008
4 cores / 8 threads, 130 Watt
1.79
+193%
Xeon 5160
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 80 Watt
0.61

Core i7-920 outperforms Xeon 5160 by a whopping 193% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-920 and Xeon 5160 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20132788
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.222.15
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesCore i7 (Desktop)no data
Power efficiency1.300.72
Architecture codenameBloomfield (2008−2010)Woodcrest (2006)
Release dateNovember 2008 (16 years ago)June 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$340$22

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon 5160 has 76% better value for money than i7-920.

Detailed specifications

Core i7-920 and Xeon 5160 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed2.66 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.93 GHz3 GHz
Bus rate1333 MHzno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)0 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)4 MB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm65 nm
Die size263 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature68 °C65 °C
Number of transistors731 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno dataB2=1.0V-1.5V, G0=.85V-1.5V

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-920 and Xeon 5160 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1366,PLGA1366LGA771
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-920 and Xeon 5160. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switching--
PAE36 Bit32 Bit
FSB parityno data+

Security technologies

Core i7-920 and Xeon 5160 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-920 and Xeon 5160 are enumerated here.

VT-x++
EPT+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-920 and Xeon 5160. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR2
Maximum memory size24 GBno data
Max memory channels3no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-920 1.79
+193%
Xeon 5160 0.61

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-920 2837
+195%
Xeon 5160 963

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i7-920 415
+9.8%
Xeon 5160 378

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i7-920 1424
+149%
Xeon 5160 571

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.79 0.61
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 80 Watt

i7-920 has a 193.4% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon 5160, on the other hand, has 62.5% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-920 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon 5160 in performance tests.

Note that Core i7-920 is a desktop processor while Xeon 5160 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-920 and Xeon 5160, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-920
Core i7-920
Intel Xeon 5160
Xeon 5160

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 399 votes

Rate Core i7-920 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 8 votes

Rate Xeon 5160 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-920 or Xeon 5160, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.