i7-2610UE vs i7-920

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-920
2008
4 cores / 8 threads, 130 Watt
1.79
+101%
Core i7-2610UE
2 cores / 4 threads, 17 Watt
0.89

Core i7-920 outperforms Core i7-2610UE by a whopping 101% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-920 and Core i7-2610UE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20132540
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.220.02
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesCore i7 (Desktop)Intel Core i7
Power efficiency1.304.95
Architecture codenameBloomfield (2008−2010)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release dateNovember 2008 (16 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$340$317

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i7-920 has 6000% better value for money than i7-2610UE.

Detailed specifications

Core i7-920 and Core i7-2610UE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads84
Base clock speed2.66 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.93 GHz1.5 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 2.0
Bus rate1333 MHz4 × 5 GT/s
Multiplierno data15
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512 KB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)4 MB
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die size263 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature68 °Cno data
Number of transistors731 million624 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-920 and Core i7-2610UE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1366,PLGA1366no data
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-920 and Core i7-2610UE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE36 Bitno data

Security technologies

Core i7-920 and Core i7-2610UE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-920 and Core i7-2610UE are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-920 and Core i7-2610UE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-1333
Maximum memory size24 GB16 GB
Max memory channels32
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s21.335 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics 3000

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-920 1.79
+101%
i7-2610UE 0.89

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-920 2838
+101%
i7-2610UE 1409

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.79 0.89
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 17 Watt

i7-920 has a 101.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

i7-2610UE, on the other hand, has a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 664.7% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-920 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-2610UE in performance tests.

Note that Core i7-920 is a desktop processor while Core i7-2610UE is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-920 and Core i7-2610UE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-920
Core i7-920
Intel Core i7-2610UE
Core i7-2610UE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 399 votes

Rate Core i7-920 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Core i7-2610UE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-920 or Core i7-2610UE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.