A8 PRO-7600B vs i7-870S

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-870S
2010
4 cores / 8 threads, 82 Watt
1.74
A8 PRO-7600B
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
1.86
+6.9%

A8 PRO-7600B outperforms Core i7-870S by a small 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-870S and A8 PRO-7600B processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20271983
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency2.012.71
Architecture codenameLynnfield (2009−2010)Kaveri (2014−2015)
Release date19 July 2010 (14 years ago)31 July 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core i7-870S and A8 PRO-7600B basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed2.66 GHz3.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz3.8 GHz
Bus rate2.5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)4096 KB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography45 nm28 nm
Die size296 mm2245 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data71 °C
Number of transistors774 million2,411 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-870S and A8 PRO-7600B compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1156,LGA1156FM2+
Power consumption (TDP)82 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-870S and A8 PRO-7600B. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
PowerTune-+
TrueAudio-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
Out-of-band client management-+
VirusProtect-+
RAID-+
HSA-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE36 Bitno data

Security technologies

Core i7-870S and A8 PRO-7600B technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-870S and A8 PRO-7600B are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-870S and A8 PRO-7600B. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-2133
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R7 Graphics
iGPU core countno data6
Number of pipelinesno data384
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-870S and A8 PRO-7600B integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i7-870S and A8 PRO-7600B integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-870S and A8 PRO-7600B.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-870S 1.74
A8 PRO-7600B 1.86
+6.9%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-870S 2765
A8 PRO-7600B 2960
+7.1%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.74 1.86
Recency 19 July 2010 31 July 2014
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 45 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 82 Watt 65 Watt

i7-870S has 100% more threads.

A8 PRO-7600B, on the other hand, has a 6.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 60.7% more advanced lithography process, and 26.2% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core i7-870S and A8 PRO-7600B.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-870S and A8 PRO-7600B, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-870S
Core i7-870S
AMD A8 PRO-7600B
A8 PRO-7600B

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 5 votes

Rate Core i7-870S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 150 votes

Rate A8 PRO-7600B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-870S or A8 PRO-7600B, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.