A10-8700P vs i7-870S

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-870S
2010
4 cores / 8 threads, 82 Watt
1.74
+23.4%
A10-8700P
2015
4 cores / 4 threads, 12 Watt
1.41

Core i7-870S outperforms A10-8700P by a significant 23% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-870S and A10-8700P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20272197
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Carrizo
Power efficiency2.013.81
Architecture codenameLynnfield (2009−2010)Carrizo (2015−2018)
Release date19 July 2010 (14 years ago)3 June 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core i7-870S and A10-8700P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed2.66 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus rate2.5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)2048 KB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography45 nm28 nm
Die size296 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Number of transistors774 million3100 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-870S and A10-8700P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA1156,LGA1156FP4
Power consumption (TDP)82 Watt12 - 35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-870S and A10-8700P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2HSA 1.0
AES-NI-+
FMA-FMA4
AVX-AVX
FRTC-+
FreeSync-+
DualGraphics-+
TrueAudio-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
Out-of-band client management-+
VirusProtect-+
HSA-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE36 Bitno data

Security technologies

Core i7-870S and A10-8700P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-870S and A10-8700P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-870S and A10-8700P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-2133
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R6 Graphics
iGPU core countno data6
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-870S and A10-8700P integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i7-870S and A10-8700P integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-870S and A10-8700P.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-870S 1.74
+23.4%
A10-8700P 1.41

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-870S 2765
+23.2%
A10-8700P 2245

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.74 1.41
Recency 19 July 2010 3 June 2015
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 45 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 82 Watt 12 Watt

i7-870S has a 23.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more threads.

A10-8700P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 60.7% more advanced lithography process, and 583.3% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-870S is our recommended choice as it beats the A10-8700P in performance tests.

Note that Core i7-870S is a desktop processor while A10-8700P is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-870S and A10-8700P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-870S
Core i7-870S
AMD A10-8700P
A10-8700P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 5 votes

Rate Core i7-870S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 119 votes

Rate A10-8700P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-870S or A10-8700P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.