Ryzen 3 3250U vs i7-840QM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-840QM
2010
4 cores / 8 threads, 45 Watt
1.23
Ryzen 3 3250U
2020
2 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
2.40
+95.1%

Ryzen 3 3250U outperforms Core i7-840QM by an impressive 95% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-840QM and Ryzen 3 3250U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking23261784
Place by popularitynot in top-10080
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i7AMD Ryzen 3
Power efficiency2.5915.14
Architecture codenameClarksfield (2009−2010)Picasso (2019−2022)
Release date20 June 2010 (14 years ago)6 January 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$568no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-840QM and Ryzen 3 3250U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads84
Base clock speed1.86 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz3.5 GHz
Bus typeDMI 1.0no data
Bus rate2.5 GT/sno data
Multiplier1426
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm12 nm
Die size296 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C95 °C
Number of transistors774 million4500 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-840QM and Ryzen 3 3250U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCPGA988,PGA988FP5
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-840QM and Ryzen 3 3250U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
PAE36 Bitno data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core i7-840QM and Ryzen 3 3250U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-840QM and Ryzen 3 3250U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-840QM and Ryzen 3 3250U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size8 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/s38.397 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardNoneAMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1200 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-840QM and Ryzen 3 3250U.

PCIe version23.0
PCI Express lanes1612

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-840QM 1.23
Ryzen 3 3250U 2.40
+95.1%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-840QM 1952
Ryzen 3 3250U 3813
+95.3%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i7-840QM 386
Ryzen 3 3250U 749
+94%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i7-840QM 1044
Ryzen 3 3250U 1456
+39.5%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

i7-840QM 3439
Ryzen 3 3250U 4088
+18.9%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

i7-840QM 9266
Ryzen 3 3250U 10251
+10.6%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

i7-840QM 3532
Ryzen 3 3250U 3966
+12.3%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

i7-840QM 40
Ryzen 3 3250U 14.5
+176%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

i7-840QM 3
Ryzen 3 3250U 4
+19.3%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.23 2.40
Recency 20 June 2010 6 January 2020
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 45 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 15 Watt

i7-840QM has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Ryzen 3 3250U, on the other hand, has a 95.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 275% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 3 3250U is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-840QM in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-840QM and Ryzen 3 3250U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-840QM
Core i7-840QM
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
Ryzen 3 3250U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 81 vote

Rate Core i7-840QM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 2159 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 3250U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-840QM or Ryzen 3 3250U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.