EPYC 7742 vs i7-840QM

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-840QM
2010
4 cores / 8 threads, 45 Watt
1.23
EPYC 7742
2019
64 cores / 128 threads, 225 Watt
43.86
+3466%

EPYC 7742 outperforms Core i7-840QM by a whopping 3466% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-840QM and EPYC 7742 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking230846
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.35
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Core i7AMD EPYC
Power efficiency2.5918.45
Architecture codenameClarksfield (2009−2010)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release date20 June 2010 (14 years ago)7 August 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$568$6,950

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-840QM and EPYC 7742 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads8128
Base clock speed1.86 GHz2.25 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz3.4 GHz
Bus typeDMI 1.0no data
Bus rate2.5 GT/sno data
Multiplier1422.5
L1 cache64 KB (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size296 mm2192 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors774 million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-840QM and EPYC 7742 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCPGA988,PGA988TR4
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt225 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-840QM and EPYC 7742. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
PAE36 Bitno data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core i7-840QM and EPYC 7742 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-840QM and EPYC 7742 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-840QM and EPYC 7742. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size8 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardNoneno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-840QM and EPYC 7742.

PCIe version2no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-840QM 1.23
EPYC 7742 43.86
+3466%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-840QM 1952
EPYC 7742 69663
+3469%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i7-840QM 383
EPYC 7742 1204
+214%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i7-840QM 1039
EPYC 7742 11782
+1034%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.23 43.86
Recency 20 June 2010 7 August 2019
Physical cores 4 64
Threads 8 128
Chip lithography 45 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 225 Watt

i7-840QM has 400% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7742, on the other hand, has a 3465.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, 1500% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7742 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-840QM in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i7-840QM is a notebook processor while EPYC 7742 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-840QM and EPYC 7742, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-840QM
Core i7-840QM
AMD EPYC 7742
EPYC 7742

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 80 votes

Rate Core i7-840QM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 128 votes

Rate EPYC 7742 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-840QM or EPYC 7742, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.