EPYC Embedded 3201 vs i7-7740K
Primary details
Comparing Core i7-7740K and EPYC Embedded 3201 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | no data | AMD EPYC Embedded |
| Architecture codename | Kaby Lake-X (2017) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| Release date | no data (2024 years ago) | 21 February 2018 (6 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core i7-7740K and EPYC Embedded 3201 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | no data | 8 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 1.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.3 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
| Multiplier | no data | 15 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 768 KB |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 4 MB |
| L3 cache | 8192 KB (shared) | 16 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | no data | 213 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 4800 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core i7-7740K and EPYC Embedded 3201 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | 1151 | AMD BGA SP4r2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 112 Watt | 30 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-7740K and EPYC Embedded 3201. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
Security technologies
Core i7-7740K and EPYC Embedded 3201 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-7740K and EPYC Embedded 3201 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-7740K and EPYC Embedded 3201. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4-2133 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 512 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 34.13 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | HD 630 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-7740K and EPYC Embedded 3201.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 32 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 4 | 8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 112 Watt | 30 Watt |
EPYC Embedded 3201 has 100% more physical cores, and 273.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core i7-7740K and EPYC Embedded 3201. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Core i7-7740K is a desktop processor while EPYC Embedded 3201 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-7740K and EPYC Embedded 3201, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
