Core i3-4130 vs Core i7-7700K
Aggregate performance score
i7-7700K outperforms i3-4130 by a whopping 192% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i7-7700K and Core i3-4130 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1028 | 1807 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 3.53 | 0.95 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Core i7 (Desktop) | no data |
| Architecture codename | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) | Haswell (2013−2015) |
| Release date | 3 January 2017 (7 years ago) | 1 September 2013 (10 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $339 | $120 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
i7-7700K has 272% better value for money than i3-4130.
Detailed specifications
Core i7-7700K and Core i3-4130 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 8 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 4.2 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.2 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| Bus support | 4 × 8 GT/s | no data |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 3 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 22 nm |
| Die size | no data | 177 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | 72 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 1,400 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | Yes | No |
Compatibility
Information on Core i7-7700K and Core i3-4130 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | FCLGA1151 | 1150 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 91 Watt | 54 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-7700K and Core i3-4130. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | + |
| TSX | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-7700K and Core i3-4130 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | no data |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-7700K and Core i3-4130. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3, DDR4 | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 38.397 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics 630 | Intel HD 4400 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-7700K and Core i3-4130.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 16 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Core i7-7700K outperforms Core i3-4130 by 192% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Core i7-7700K outperforms Core i3-4130 by 192% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 41%
Core i7-7700K outperforms Core i3-4130 by 58% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 41%
Core i7-7700K outperforms Core i3-4130 by 161% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
3DMark Fire Strike Physics
Benchmark coverage: 4%
Core i7-7700K outperforms Core i3-4130 by 186% in 3DMark Fire Strike Physics.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 6.24 | 2.14 |
| Recency | 3 January 2017 | 1 September 2013 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
| Threads | 8 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 22 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 91 Watt | 54 Watt |
i7-7700K has a 191.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.
i3-4130, on the other hand, has 68.5% lower power consumption.
The Core i7-7700K is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-4130 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-7700K and Core i3-4130, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
