Core i5-3230M vs Core i7-7700HQ

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-7700HQ
2017
4 cores / 8 threads, 45 Watt
4.47
+169%

i7-7700HQ outperforms i5-3230M by a whopping 169% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-7700HQ and Core i5-3230M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking12731989
Place by popularity80not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i7Intel Core i5
Architecture codenameKaby Lake (2016−2019)Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Release date3 January 2017 (7 years ago)1 January 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$378$225
Current price$1455 (3.8x MSRP)$93 (0.4x MSRP)

Detailed specifications

Core i7-7700HQ and Core i5-3230M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads84
Base clock speed2.8 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz3.2 GHz
L1 cache256 KB128 KB
L2 cache1 MB512 KB
L3 cache6 MB3 MB
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Die size126 mm2118 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-7700HQ and Core i5-3230M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketBGAFCPGA988
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-7700HQ and Core i5-3230M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-7700HQ and Core i5-3230M are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d++
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-7700HQ and Core i5-3230M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR3
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/s25.6 GB/s
ECC memory support--

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 630Intel HD Graphics 4000

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-7700HQ and Core i5-3230M.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-7700HQ 4.47
+169%
i5-3230M 1.66

Core i7-7700HQ outperforms Core i5-3230M by 169% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i7-7700HQ 6915
+170%
i5-3230M 2560

Core i7-7700HQ outperforms Core i5-3230M by 170% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-7700HQ 1149
+126%
i5-3230M 509

Core i7-7700HQ outperforms Core i5-3230M by 126% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-7700HQ 3576
+250%
i5-3230M 1023

Core i7-7700HQ outperforms Core i5-3230M by 250% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

i7-7700HQ 5910
+38.5%
i5-3230M 4268

Core i7-7700HQ outperforms Core i5-3230M by 38% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i7-7700HQ 22152
+142%
i5-3230M 9159

Core i7-7700HQ outperforms Core i5-3230M by 142% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i7-7700HQ 7686
+104%
i5-3230M 3760

Core i7-7700HQ outperforms Core i5-3230M by 104% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

i7-7700HQ 7.5
+138%
i5-3230M 17.83

Core i5-3230M outperforms Core i7-7700HQ by 138% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

i7-7700HQ 8
+174%
i5-3230M 3

Core i7-7700HQ outperforms Core i5-3230M by 174% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

i7-7700HQ 734
+184%
i5-3230M 258

Core i7-7700HQ outperforms Core i5-3230M by 184% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

i7-7700HQ 159
+51.4%
i5-3230M 105

Core i7-7700HQ outperforms Core i5-3230M by 51% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

i7-7700HQ 1.81
+44.8%
i5-3230M 1.25

Core i7-7700HQ outperforms Core i5-3230M by 45% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i7-7700HQ 4.1
+173%
i5-3230M 1.5

Core i7-7700HQ outperforms Core i5-3230M by 173% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i7-7700HQ 4542
+41.1%
i5-3230M 3219

Core i7-7700HQ outperforms Core i5-3230M by 41% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i7-7700HQ 46
+302%
i5-3230M 11

Core i7-7700HQ outperforms Core i5-3230M by 302% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i7-7700HQ 168
+181%
i5-3230M 60

Core i7-7700HQ outperforms Core i5-3230M by 181% in x264 encoding pass 1.

3DMark Fire Strike Physics

Benchmark coverage: 4%

i7-7700HQ 9510
+181%
i5-3230M 3380

Core i7-7700HQ outperforms Core i5-3230M by 181% in 3DMark Fire Strike Physics.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.47 1.66
Integrated graphics card 3.10 1.18
Recency 3 January 2017 1 January 2013
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 4
Cost $378 $225
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 35 Watt

i7-7700HQ has a 169.3% higher aggregate performance score, 162.7% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 4 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

i5-3230M, on the other hand, has its recommended price lower by $153, and 28.6% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-7700HQ is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-3230M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-7700HQ and Core i5-3230M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-7700HQ
Core i7-7700HQ
Intel Core i5-3230M
Core i5-3230M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1154 votes

Rate Core i7-7700HQ on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 1031 vote

Rate Core i5-3230M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-7700HQ or Core i5-3230M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.