Xeon E5-4650 v4 vs i7-720QM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-720QM
2009
4 cores / 8 threads, 45 Watt
1.04
Xeon E5-4650 v4
2016
14 cores / 28 threads, 105 Watt
10.00
+862%

Xeon E5-4650 v4 outperforms Core i7-720QM by a whopping 862% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-720QM and Xeon E5-4650 v4 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2442775
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.09
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Core i7Intel Xeon E5
Power efficiency2.199.01
Architecture codenameClarksfield (2009−2010)Broadwell (2015−2019)
Release date23 September 2009 (15 years ago)20 June 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$546$3,838

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-720QM and Xeon E5-4650 v4 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)14 (Tetradeca-Core)
Threads828
Base clock speed1.6 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz2.8 GHz
Bus typeDMI 1.0QPI
Bus rate2.5 GT/s2 × 9.6 GT/s
Multiplier1222
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)3.5 MB
L3 cache6 MB (shared)35 MB
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Die size296 mm2306.18 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C80 °C
Number of transistors774 million4700 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-720QM and Xeon E5-4650 v4 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)4 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCPGA988,PGA988FCLGA2011
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-720QM and Xeon E5-4650 v4. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data-
PAE36 Bit46 Bit

Security technologies

Core i7-720QM and Xeon E5-4650 v4 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-720QM and Xeon E5-4650 v4 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-720QM and Xeon E5-4650 v4. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1066, DDR3-1333DDR4
Maximum memory size8 GB1.5 TB
Max memory channels24
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/s68 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardNoneno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-720QM and Xeon E5-4650 v4.

PCIe version23.0
PCI Express lanes1640

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-720QM 1.04
Xeon E5-4650 v4 10.00
+862%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-720QM 1659
Xeon E5-4650 v4 15883
+857%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.04 10.00
Recency 23 September 2009 20 June 2016
Physical cores 4 14
Threads 8 28
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 105 Watt

i7-720QM has 133.3% lower power consumption.

Xeon E5-4650 v4, on the other hand, has a 861.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 250% more physical cores and 250% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon E5-4650 v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-720QM in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i7-720QM is a notebook processor while Xeon E5-4650 v4 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-720QM and Xeon E5-4650 v4, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-720QM
Core i7-720QM
Intel Xeon E5-4650 v4
Xeon E5-4650 v4

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 157 votes

Rate Core i7-720QM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 14 votes

Rate Xeon E5-4650 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-720QM or Xeon E5-4650 v4, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.