Core 2 Extreme X7900 vs Core i7-6950X

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-6950X
2016
10 cores / 20 threads, 140 Watt
11.35
+1476%
Core 2 Extreme X7900
2007
2 cores / 2 threads, 44 Watt
0.72

Core i7-6950X outperforms Core 2 Extreme X7900 by a whopping 1476% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-6950X and Core 2 Extreme X7900 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking7072705
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.85no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i7 (Desktop)Intel Core 2 Extreme
Power efficiency7.391.49
Architecture codenameBroadwell-E (2016)Merom (2006−2008)
Release date31 May 2016 (8 years ago)1 September 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,723$851

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-6950X and Core 2 Extreme X7900 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads202
Base clock speed3 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz2.8 GHz
Bus rate9.6 GT/s / QPI800 MHz
L1 cache32K (per core)128 KB
L2 cache256K (per core)4 MB
L3 cache25 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm65 nm
Die size246 mm2143 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistors3,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-
VID voltage rangeno data1.1V-1.375V

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-6950X and Core 2 Extreme X7900 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA2011PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt44 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-6950X and Core 2 Extreme X7900. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States+-
Smart Response+no data
Demand Based Switchingno data-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
AMTno data+
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Core i7-6950X and Core 2 Extreme X7900 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-6950X and Core 2 Extreme X7900 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-6950X and Core 2 Extreme X7900. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR1
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-6950X and Core 2 Extreme X7900.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-6950X 11.35
+1476%
Core 2 Extreme X7900 0.72

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-6950X 17374
+1474%
Core 2 Extreme X7900 1104

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i7-6950X 1316
+240%
Core 2 Extreme X7900 387

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i7-6950X 8588
+1274%
Core 2 Extreme X7900 625

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

i7-6950X 6231
+106%
Core 2 Extreme X7900 3022

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

i7-6950X 40378
+601%
Core 2 Extreme X7900 5764

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

i7-6950X 10658
+335%
Core 2 Extreme X7900 2449

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

i7-6950X 3.5
+787%
Core 2 Extreme X7900 31.05

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.35 0.72
Recency 31 May 2016 1 September 2007
Physical cores 10 2
Threads 20 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 44 Watt

i7-6950X has a 1476.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 400% more physical cores and 900% more threads, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

Core 2 Extreme X7900, on the other hand, has 218.2% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-6950X is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Extreme X7900 in performance tests.

Note that Core i7-6950X is a desktop processor while Core 2 Extreme X7900 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-6950X and Core 2 Extreme X7900, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-6950X
Core i7-6950X
Intel Core 2 Extreme X7900
Core 2 Extreme X7900

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 253 votes

Rate Core i7-6950X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 6 votes

Rate Core 2 Extreme X7900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-6950X or Core 2 Extreme X7900, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.