i5-13400F vs i7-6900K

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-6900K
2016
8 cores / 16 threads, 140 Watt
9.11
Core i5-13400F
2023
10 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
15.83
+73.8%

Core i5-13400F outperforms Core i7-6900K by an impressive 74% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-6900K and Core i5-13400F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking842432
Place by popularitynot in top-10046
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.0458.38
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency6.1623.05
Architecture codenameBroadwell-E (2016)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date31 May 2016 (8 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,020$196

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i5-13400F has 5513% better value for money than i7-6900K.

Detailed specifications

Core i7-6900K and Core i5-13400F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads1616
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz4.6 GHz
L1 cache32 KB (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache20 MB (shared)20 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data257 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-6900K and Core i5-13400F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-6900K and Core i5-13400F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring-+
Smart Response+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+-
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Core i7-6900K and Core i5-13400F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-6900K and Core i5-13400F are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-6900K and Core i5-13400F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5, DDR4
Maximum memory size128 GB192 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidthno data76.8 GB/s

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-6900K and Core i5-13400F.

PCIe version3.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes4016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-6900K 9.11
i5-13400F 15.83
+73.8%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-6900K 14470
i5-13400F 25138
+73.7%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i7-6900K 1286
i5-13400F 2302
+79%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i7-6900K 7200
i5-13400F 10998
+52.8%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.11 15.83
Recency 31 May 2016 4 January 2023
Physical cores 8 10
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 65 Watt

i5-13400F has a 73.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 25% more physical cores, and 115.4% lower power consumption.

The Core i5-13400F is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-6900K in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-6900K and Core i5-13400F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-6900K
Core i7-6900K
Intel Core i5-13400F
Core i5-13400F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 114 votes

Rate Core i7-6900K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 3328 votes

Rate Core i5-13400F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-6900K or Core i5-13400F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.