A4-1200 vs i7-6900K

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-6900K and A4-1200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking834not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.97no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD A-Series
Power efficiency6.16no data
Architecture codenameBroadwell-E (2016)Temash (2013)
Release date31 May 2016 (8 years ago)23 May 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,020no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-6900K and A4-1200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads162
Base clock speed3.2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4 GHz1 GHz
L1 cache32 KB (per core)128K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache20 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data246 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C90 °C
Number of transistorsno data1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-6900K and A4-1200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA2011FT3
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt4 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-6900K and A4-1200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Smart Response+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data

Security technologies

Core i7-6900K and A4-1200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-6900K and A4-1200 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-6900K and A4-1200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 8180

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-6900K and A4-1200.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-6900K 14470
+3821%
A4-1200 369

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i7-6900K 1286
+1069%
A4-1200 110

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i7-6900K 7200
+3689%
A4-1200 190

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 May 2016 23 May 2013
Physical cores 8 2
Threads 16 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 4 Watt

i7-6900K has an age advantage of 3 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

A4-1200, on the other hand, has 3400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core i7-6900K and A4-1200. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Core i7-6900K is a desktop processor while A4-1200 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-6900K and A4-1200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-6900K
Core i7-6900K
AMD A4-1200
A4-1200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 108 votes

Rate Core i7-6900K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 40 votes

Rate A4-1200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-6900K or A4-1200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.