Ryzen 3 4300G vs i7-6820EQ

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-6820EQ
2015
4 cores / 8 threads, 45 Watt
4.49
Ryzen 3 4300G
2020
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
6.93
+54.3%

Ryzen 3 4300G outperforms Core i7-6820EQ by an impressive 54% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-6820EQ and Ryzen 3 4300G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking13321020
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.57no data
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i7AMD Ryzen 3
Power efficiency9.279.90
Architecture codenameSkylake (2015−2016)Renoir (2020−2023)
Release date12 October 2015 (9 years ago)21 July 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$378no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-6820EQ and Ryzen 3 4300G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speedno data3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz4 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier2838
L1 cache256 KB256 KB
L2 cache1 MB2 MB
L3 cache8 MB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm
Die size122 mm2156 mm2
Number of transistorsno data9800 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-6820EQ and Ryzen 3 4300G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
Socketno dataAM4
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-6820EQ and Ryzen 3 4300G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+-

Security technologies

Core i7-6820EQ and Ryzen 3 4300G technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-6820EQ and Ryzen 3 4300G are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-6820EQ and Ryzen 3 4300G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesLPDDR3-1866DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size64 GB128 GB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/s51.196 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 530AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-6820EQ and Ryzen 3 4300G.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-6820EQ 4.49
Ryzen 3 4300G 6.93
+54.3%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-6820EQ 7001
Ryzen 3 4300G 10802
+54.3%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.49 6.93
Integrated graphics card 2.59 3.04
Recency 12 October 2015 21 July 2020
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 65 Watt

i7-6820EQ has 44.4% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 3 4300G, on the other hand, has a 54.3% higher aggregate performance score, 17.4% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 3 4300G is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-6820EQ in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i7-6820EQ is a notebook processor while Ryzen 3 4300G is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-6820EQ and Ryzen 3 4300G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-6820EQ
Core i7-6820EQ
AMD Ryzen 3 4300G
Ryzen 3 4300G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1 vote

Rate Core i7-6820EQ on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 166 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 4300G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-6820EQ or Ryzen 3 4300G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.