EPYC 9575F vs i7-6700K
Primary details
Comparing Core i7-6700K and EPYC 9575F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1135 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 1.06 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | Intel Core i7 (Desktop) | no data |
| Power efficiency | 5.84 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Skylake (2015−2016) | Turin (2024) |
| Release date | 1 September 2015 (9 years ago) | 10 October 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $339 | $11,791 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Core i7-6700K and EPYC 9575F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 128 |
| Base clock speed | 4 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.2 GHz | 5 GHz |
| Bus type | DMI 3.0 | no data |
| Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 40 | no data |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 8 MB (shared) | 256 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | 122 mm2 | 8x 70.6 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 64 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1750 Million | 66,520 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core i7-6700K and EPYC 9575F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 2 |
| Socket | FCLGA1151 | SP5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 91 Watt | 400 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-6700K and EPYC 9575F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Core i7-6700K and EPYC 9575F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
| Secure Key | + | no data |
| MPX | + | - |
| Identity Protection | + | - |
| SGX | Yes with Intel® ME | no data |
| OS Guard | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-6700K and EPYC 9575F are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-6700K and EPYC 9575F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3, DDR4 | DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 34.134 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics 530 | N/A |
| Max video memory | 64 GB | no data |
| Quick Sync Video | + | - |
| Clear Video | + | no data |
| Clear Video HD | + | no data |
| Graphics max frequency | 1.15 GHz | no data |
| InTru 3D | + | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-6700K and EPYC 9575F integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 3 | no data |
| eDP | + | no data |
| DisplayPort | + | - |
| HDMI | + | - |
| DVI | + | no data |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i7-6700K and EPYC 9575F integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
| 4K resolution support | + | no data |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@24Hz | no data |
| Max resolution over eDP | 4096x2304@60Hz | no data |
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 4096x2304@60Hz | no data |
| Max resolution over VGA | N/A | no data |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Core i7-6700K and EPYC 9575F integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | 12 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-6700K and EPYC 9575F.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 128 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 September 2015 | 10 October 2024 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 64 |
| Threads | 8 | 128 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 91 Watt | 400 Watt |
i7-6700K has 339.6% lower power consumption.
EPYC 9575F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, 1500% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Core i7-6700K and EPYC 9575F. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Core i7-6700K is a desktop processor while EPYC 9575F is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-6700K and EPYC 9575F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
