Atom Z540 vs i7-660UM

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-660UM
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 18 Watt
0.81
+268%
Atom Z540
2008
1 core / 2 threads, 2 Watt
0.22

Core i7-660UM outperforms Atom Z540 by a whopping 268% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-660UM and Atom Z540 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26093200
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i7Intel Atom
Power efficiency4.268.68
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)Silverthorne (2008−2010)
Release date24 May 2010 (14 years ago)2 April 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$317$160

Detailed specifications

Core i7-660UM and Atom Z540 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.33 GHz1.86 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz0.07 GHz
Bus typeDMI 1.0FSB
Bus rate1 × 2.5 GT/s533.33 MT/s
Multiplier1014
L1 cache64 KB (per core)56 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512 KB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size81+144 mm224.18 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C90 °C
Number of transistors382+177 Million47 Million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.75 -1.1V

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-660UM and Atom Z540 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketBGA1288PBGA441
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt2.4 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-660UM and Atom Z540. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology+-
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switchingno data+
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Core i7-660UM and Atom Z540 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-660UM and Atom Z540 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-660UM and Atom Z540. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800no data
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth12.799 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel Processors-
Clear Video+-
Clear Video HD+-
Graphics max frequency500 MHz-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-660UM and Atom Z540 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-660UM and Atom Z540.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-660UM 0.81
+268%
Atom Z540 0.22

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-660UM 1284
+269%
Atom Z540 348

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.81 0.22
Recency 24 May 2010 2 April 2008
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 2 Watt

i7-660UM has a 268.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

Atom Z540, on the other hand, has 800% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-660UM is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom Z540 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-660UM and Atom Z540, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-660UM
Core i7-660UM
Intel Atom Z540
Atom Z540

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Core i7-660UM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 5 votes

Rate Atom Z540 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-660UM or Atom Z540, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.