Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U vs i7-620M
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U outperforms Core i7-620M by a whopping 200% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i7-620M and Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2313 | 1485 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Core i7 | AMD Ryzen 3 |
| Power efficiency | 3.38 | 23.66 |
| Architecture codename | Arrandale (2010−2011) | Picasso (2019−2022) |
| Release date | 7 January 2010 (14 years ago) | 8 April 2019 (5 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $332 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Core i7-620M and Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2.66 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.33 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Bus type | DMI 1.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Bus rate | 1 × 2.5 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 15 | 21 |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 128K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 4 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 12 nm |
| Die size | 81+114 mm2 | 246 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 384 million | 4940 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Core i7-620M and Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | BGA1288,PGA988 | FP5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-620M and Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | - | + |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | + | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Flex Memory Access | + | no data |
| PAE | 36 Bit | no data |
| FDI | + | no data |
| Fast Memory Access | + | no data |
Security technologies
Core i7-620M and Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-620M and Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-620M and Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4 Dual-channel |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | 32 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 17.051 GB/s | 38.397 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel Processors | AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1200 MHz) |
| Clear Video | + | no data |
| Clear Video HD | + | no data |
| Graphics max frequency | 766 MHz | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-620M and Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 2 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-620M and Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 12 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.25 | 3.75 |
| Integrated graphics card | 0.77 | 3.04 |
| Recency | 7 January 2010 | 8 April 2019 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 15 Watt |
Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U has a 200% higher aggregate performance score, 294.8% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 9 years, 100% more physical cores, a 166.7% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.
The Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-620M in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-620M and Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
