i9-13900KF vs i7-620M

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-620M
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.24
Core i9-13900KF
2022
24 cores / 32 threads, 125 Watt
36.71
+2860%

Core i9-13900KF outperforms Core i7-620M by a whopping 2860% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-620M and Core i9-13900KF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking230193
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data61.37
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i7Intel Core i9
Power efficiency3.3513.73
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)
Release date7 January 2010 (14 years ago)27 September 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$332$564

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-620M and Core i9-13900KF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads432
Base clock speed2.66 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.33 GHz5.7 GHz
Bus typeDMI 1.0no data
Bus rate1 × 2.5 GT/s4 × 16 GT/s
Multiplier1530
L1 cache64K (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size81+114 mm2257 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors384 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-620M and Core i9-13900KF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketBGA1288,PGA988FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt125 W, 253 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-620M and Core i9-13900KF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX-+
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology+2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
PAE36 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Core i7-620M and Core i9-13900KF technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-620M and Core i9-13900KF are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-620M and Core i9-13900KF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size8 GB192 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth17.051 GB/s89.604 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® Processorsno data
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency766 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-620M and Core i9-13900KF integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-620M and Core i9-13900KF.

PCIe version2.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-620M 1.24
i9-13900KF 36.71
+2860%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-620M 1975
i9-13900KF 58306
+2852%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i7-620M 443
i9-13900KF 2920
+559%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i7-620M 822
i9-13900KF 19650
+2291%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.24 36.71
Recency 7 January 2010 27 September 2022
Physical cores 2 24
Threads 4 32
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 125 Watt

i7-620M has 257.1% lower power consumption.

i9-13900KF, on the other hand, has a 2860.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, and 1100% more physical cores and 700% more threads.

The Core i9-13900KF is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-620M in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i7-620M is a notebook processor while Core i9-13900KF is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-620M and Core i9-13900KF, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-620M
Core i7-620M
Intel Core i9-13900KF
Core i9-13900KF

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 325 votes

Rate Core i7-620M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 629 votes

Rate Core i9-13900KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-620M or Core i9-13900KF, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.