Ryzen 7 9700X vs i7-5930K

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-5930K
2014
6 cores / 12 threads, 140 Watt
6.50
Ryzen 7 9700X
2024
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
23.47
+261%

Ryzen 7 9700X outperforms Core i7-5930K by a whopping 261% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-5930K and Ryzen 7 9700X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1046217
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.7950.86
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency4.3934.17
Architecture codenameHaswell-E (2014)Granite Ridge (2024)
Release date1 September 2014 (10 years ago)8 August 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$613$359

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 7 9700X has 6338% better value for money than i7-5930K.

Detailed specifications

Core i7-5930K and Ryzen 7 9700X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1216
Base clock speed3.5 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz5.5 GHz
Bus rate0 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache15 MB (shared)32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm4 nm
Die size356 mm270.6 mm2
Maximum core temperature67 °C95 °C
Number of transistors2,600 million8,315 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-5930K and Ryzen 7 9700X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA2011AM5
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-5930K and Ryzen 7 9700X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core i7-5930K and Ryzen 7 9700X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Identity Protection+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-5930K and Ryzen 7 9700X are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-5930K and Ryzen 7 9700X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth68 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon Graphics

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-5930K and Ryzen 7 9700X.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes4024

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-5930K 6.50
Ryzen 7 9700X 23.47
+261%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-5930K 10329
Ryzen 7 9700X 37280
+261%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.50 23.47
Recency 1 September 2014 8 August 2024
Physical cores 6 8
Threads 12 16
Chip lithography 22 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 65 Watt

Ryzen 7 9700X has a 261.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads, a 450% more advanced lithography process, and 115.4% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 7 9700X is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-5930K in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-5930K and Ryzen 7 9700X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-5930K
Core i7-5930K
AMD Ryzen 7 9700X
Ryzen 7 9700X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 165 votes

Rate Core i7-5930K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 222 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 9700X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-5930K or Ryzen 7 9700X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.