i5-13600KF vs i7-4950HQ
Aggregate performance score
Core i5-13600KF outperforms Core i7-4950HQ by a whopping 474% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i7-4950HQ and Core i5-13600KF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1385 | 211 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 63.35 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Core i7 | Intel Core i5 |
| Power efficiency | 8.36 | 12.45 |
| Architecture codename | Crystalwell (2013−2014) | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) |
| Release date | 7 June 2013 (11 years ago) | 27 September 2022 (2 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $657 | $294 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Core i7-4950HQ and Core i5-13600KF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 14 (Tetradeca-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 20 |
| Base clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| Bus type | DMI 2.0 | DMI 4.0 |
| Bus rate | 5 GT/s | 4 × 16 GT/s |
| Multiplier | 24 | 35 |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 80K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256K (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 8 MB (shared) | 24 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Die size | 264 mm2 | 257 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 100 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 100 °C | 72 °C |
| Number of transistors | 1,400 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Core i7-4950HQ and Core i5-13600KF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FCBGA1364 | FCLGA1700 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 47 Watt | 125 W, 181 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-4950HQ and Core i5-13600KF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| My WiFi | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | + |
| TSX | + | - |
| Idle States | + | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | + |
| FDI | + | no data |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Core i7-4950HQ and Core i5-13600KF technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | + | + |
| Secure Key | + | + |
| Identity Protection | + | - |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
| Anti-Theft | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-4950HQ and Core i5-13600KF are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-4950HQ and Core i5-13600KF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB | 192 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | 89.604 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | no data |
| Max video memory | 2 GB | no data |
| Quick Sync Video | + | - |
| Clear Video HD | + | no data |
| Graphics max frequency | 1.3 GHz | no data |
| InTru 3D | + | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-4950HQ and Core i5-13600KF integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 3 | no data |
| eDP | + | no data |
| DisplayPort | + | - |
| HDMI | + | - |
| VGA | + | no data |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i7-4950HQ and Core i5-13600KF integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 3840x2160@30Hz | no data |
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 3840x2160@60Hz | no data |
| Max resolution over VGA | 2880x1800@60Hz | no data |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Core i7-4950HQ and Core i5-13600KF integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | 11.2/12 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-4950HQ and Core i5-13600KF.
| PCIe version | 3 | 5.0 and 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 20 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 4.15 | 23.81 |
| Recency | 7 June 2013 | 27 September 2022 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 14 |
| Threads | 8 | 20 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 47 Watt | 125 Watt |
i7-4950HQ has 166% lower power consumption.
i5-13600KF, on the other hand, has a 473.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and 250% more physical cores and 150% more threads.
The Core i5-13600KF is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-4950HQ in performance tests.
Be aware that Core i7-4950HQ is a notebook processor while Core i5-13600KF is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-4950HQ and Core i5-13600KF, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
