FX-8320E vs i7-4820K

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-4820K
2013
4 cores / 8 threads, 130 Watt
4.16
+30.8%
FX-8320E
2014
8 cores / 8 threads, 95 Watt
3.18

Core i7-4820K outperforms FX-8320E by a substantial 31% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-4820K and FX-8320E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking13951613
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.460.70
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency2.973.11
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge-E (2013)Vishera (2012−2015)
Release date1 September 2013 (11 years ago)2 September 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399$147

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

FX-8320E has 52% better value for money than i7-4820K.

Detailed specifications

Core i7-4820K and FX-8320E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speed3.7 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz4 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)8192 KB
L3 cache10 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography22 nm32 nm
Die size257 mm2315 mm2
Maximum core temperature67 °C71 °C
Number of transistors1,860 million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier++
P0 Vcore voltageno dataMin: 1.075 V - Max: 1.2875 V

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-4820K and FX-8320E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA2011AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-4820K and FX-8320E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXno data
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data

Security technologies

Core i7-4820K and FX-8320E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Identity Protection+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-4820K and FX-8320E are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-4820K and FX-8320E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth59.7 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-4820K and FX-8320E.

PCIe version3.0n/a
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-4820K 4.16
+30.8%
FX-8320E 3.18

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-4820K 6481
+30.7%
FX-8320E 4960

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i7-4820K 672
+53.4%
FX-8320E 438

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i7-4820K 2509
+48.4%
FX-8320E 1691

3DMark Fire Strike Physics

i7-4820K 9210
+42.6%
FX-8320E 6460

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.16 3.18
Recency 1 September 2013 2 September 2014
Physical cores 4 8
Chip lithography 22 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 95 Watt

i7-4820K has a 30.8% higher aggregate performance score, and a 45.5% more advanced lithography process.

FX-8320E, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more physical cores, and 36.8% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-4820K is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-8320E in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-4820K and FX-8320E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-4820K
Core i7-4820K
AMD FX-8320E
FX-8320E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 131 vote

Rate Core i7-4820K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1106 votes

Rate FX-8320E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-4820K or FX-8320E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.