Core i7-3632QM vs Core i7-4800MQ

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-4800MQ
2013
4 cores / 8 threads, 47 Watt
3.71
+22%

i7-4800MQ outperforms i7-3632QM by a significant 22% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-4800MQ and Core i7-3632QM processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking14151560
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i7Intel Core i7
Architecture codenameHaswell (2013−2015)Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Release date1 June 2013 (11 years ago)30 September 2012 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$378$359
Current price$253 (0.7x MSRP)$504 (1.4x MSRP)

Detailed specifications

Core i7-4800MQ and Core i7-3632QM basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speed2.7 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz3.2 GHz
L1 cache256 KB256 KB
L2 cache1 MB1 MB
L3 cache6 MB6 MB
Chip lithography22 nm22 nm
Die size177 mm2160 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)100 °Cno data
Number of transistors1400 Million1400 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-4800MQ and Core i7-3632QM compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketrPGAFCBGA1224, FCPGA988
Power consumption (TDP)47 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-4800MQ and Core i7-3632QM. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+no data

Security technologies

Core i7-4800MQ and Core i7-3632QM technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-4800MQ and Core i7-3632QM are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-dno data+
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-4800MQ and Core i7-3632QM. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s25.6 GB/s
ECC memory support--

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 4600Intel HD Graphics 4000

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-4800MQ and Core i7-3632QM.

PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-4800MQ 3.71
+22%
i7-3632QM 3.04

Core i7-4800MQ outperforms Core i7-3632QM by 22% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i7-4800MQ 5737
+22%
i7-3632QM 4701

Core i7-4800MQ outperforms Core i7-3632QM by 22% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-4800MQ 1038
+108%
i7-3632QM 500

Core i7-4800MQ outperforms Core i7-3632QM by 108% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-4800MQ 3088
+84.2%
i7-3632QM 1676

Core i7-4800MQ outperforms Core i7-3632QM by 84% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

i7-4800MQ 5233
+21.9%
i7-3632QM 4294

Core i7-4800MQ outperforms Core i7-3632QM by 22% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i7-4800MQ 20089
+24.6%
i7-3632QM 16117

Core i7-4800MQ outperforms Core i7-3632QM by 25% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i7-4800MQ 7265
+27.9%
i7-3632QM 5681

Core i7-4800MQ outperforms Core i7-3632QM by 28% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

i7-4800MQ 7.72
+27.7%
i7-3632QM 9.86

Core i7-3632QM outperforms Core i7-4800MQ by 28% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

i7-4800MQ 7
+23.9%
i7-3632QM 6

Core i7-4800MQ outperforms Core i7-3632QM by 24% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

i7-4800MQ 663
+27.3%
i7-3632QM 521

Core i7-4800MQ outperforms Core i7-3632QM by 27% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

i7-4800MQ 142
+25.7%
i7-3632QM 113

Core i7-4800MQ outperforms Core i7-3632QM by 26% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

i7-4800MQ 1.63
+23.5%
i7-3632QM 1.32

Core i7-4800MQ outperforms Core i7-3632QM by 23% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i7-4800MQ 4.1
+39.7%
i7-3632QM 2.9

Core i7-4800MQ outperforms Core i7-3632QM by 40% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i7-4800MQ 4473
+9.9%
i7-3632QM 4069

Core i7-4800MQ outperforms Core i7-3632QM by 10% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i7-4800MQ 42
+30.1%
i7-3632QM 32

Core i7-4800MQ outperforms Core i7-3632QM by 30% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i7-4800MQ 160
+27.7%
i7-3632QM 125

Core i7-4800MQ outperforms Core i7-3632QM by 28% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

i7-4800MQ 12753
+24.5%
i7-3632QM 10241

Core i7-4800MQ outperforms Core i7-3632QM by 25% in Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core.

Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

i7-4800MQ 3355
+22.1%
i7-3632QM 2748

Core i7-4800MQ outperforms Core i7-3632QM by 22% in Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.71 3.04
Integrated graphics card 1.84 1.18
Recency 1 June 2013 30 September 2012
Cost $378 $359
Power consumption (TDP) 47 Watt 35 Watt

i7-4800MQ has a 22% higher aggregate performance score, 55.9% faster integrated GPU, and an age advantage of 8 months.

i7-3632QM, on the other hand, has its recommended price lower by $19, and 34.3% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-4800MQ is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-3632QM in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-4800MQ and Core i7-3632QM, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-4800MQ
Core i7-4800MQ
Intel Core i7-3632QM
Core i7-3632QM

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 172 votes

Rate Core i7-4800MQ on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 682 votes

Rate Core i7-3632QM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-4800MQ or Core i7-3632QM, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.